Open-source framework for orchestrating role-playing autonomous AI agents in collaborative crews.
Multi-agentTool useMemory
Demo · hover to play
AutoGen vs Langdockwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Microsoft's open-source multi-agent framework — orchestrate conversations between specialised agents.
Multi-agentTool useCodeMemory
AutoGen vs Langdock — specs
| Spec | AutoGen | Langdock |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 72 / 100 (A) | 77 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Free · OSS | Subscription · from $30 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | Multi-agent, Tool use, Code, Memory | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Apr 2024 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
AutoGen
Agent Rank
72/ 100
- Autonomy
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing
- 10
- Polish
- 7
- Verifiability
- 7
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Langdock
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- Autonomy
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 10
- Pricing
- 7
- Polish
- 7
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
AutoGen
Langdock
Pros
- +GDPR-native — built EU-first with German data residency and strict compliance defaults
- +Multi-model BYO (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google) without lock-in
- +Strong agent builder + connector library — Glean-class but priced for European mid-market
Cons
- −Smaller US presence and US partner ecosystem
- −Newer than Glean — fewer published US Fortune 500 case studies
- −Per-seat pricing adds up at scale (>50 users)
Pricing
AutoGen
Langdock
Free
Free
Individuals
- +1 workspace
- +GPT-4o + Claude
- +Limited connectors
Recommended
Pro
$30/seat/mo
Teams
- +Multi-model BYO
- +All connectors
- +Agent builder
Enterprise
Custom
Large EU orgs
- +SSO + audit
- +Custom retention
- +Dedicated EU tenant
Which one should you pick?
AutoGen
Pick AutoGen if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try AutoGen →Langdock
Pick Langdock if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Langdock →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick AutoGen or Langdock in 2026?+
Pick AutoGen if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Langdock if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use AutoGen for primary work and Langdock for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between AutoGen and Langdock?+
AutoGen starts at Free · OSS; Langdock starts at Subscription · from $30. AutoGen is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, AutoGen or Langdock?+
AutoGen is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing AutoGen and Langdock also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
LangChain's stateful multi-agent framework — graph-based orchestration with persistence and human-in-the-loop.
Multi-agentTool useMemory
Demo · hover to playOpenAI's lightweight multi-agent reference implementation — handoff + routine patterns, educational.
Multi-agentTool use
Demo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to AutoGen · alternatives to Langdock
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison