aiagentrank.io

AutoGen vs Langdockwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?

Microsoft's open-source multi-agent framework — orchestrate conversations between specialised agents.

⚙️OpsAutonomousOpen source
Multi-agentTool useCodeMemory

GDPR-native multi-model AI workspace with built-in agent builder — Europe's Glean alternative.

⚙️OpsSemi-autonomousSubscription · from $30
Tool useMemoryRAGMulti-agent

AutoGen vs Langdock — specs

SpecAutoGenLangdock
Agent Rank72 / 100 (A)77 / 100 (A)
AutonomyAutonomousSemi-autonomous
PricingFree · OSSSubscription · from $30
Open sourceYesNo
CapabilitiesMulti-agent, Tool use, Code, MemoryTool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent
Integrations3 apps5 apps
VerifiedVerified
ReleasedApr 2024Feb 2025

Categories: AutoGenOps · LangdockOps

Agent Rank breakdown

AutoGen
Agent Rank
72/ 100
AA-tier
自律性
9
機能
8
連携
2
料金
10
完成度
7
検証性
7

自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?

Langdock
Agent Rank
77/ 100
AA-tier
自律性
8
機能
8
連携
10
料金
7
完成度
7
検証性
6

自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?

Pros & cons

AutoGen
Langdock
メリット
  • +GDPR-native — built EU-first with German data residency and strict compliance defaults
  • +Multi-model BYO (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google) without lock-in
  • +Strong agent builder + connector library — Glean-class but priced for European mid-market
デメリット
  • Smaller US presence and US partner ecosystem
  • Newer than Glean — fewer published US Fortune 500 case studies
  • Per-seat pricing adds up at scale (>50 users)

Pricing

AutoGen
Langdock
Free
無料
Individuals
  • +1 workspace
  • +GPT-4o + Claude
  • +Limited connectors
おすすめ
Pro
$30/席/月
Teams
  • +Multi-model BYO
  • +All connectors
  • +Agent builder
Enterprise
カスタム
Large EU orgs
  • +SSO + audit
  • +Custom retention
  • +Dedicated EU tenant

Which one should you pick?

AutoGen

Pick AutoGen if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.

Try AutoGen →
Langdock

Pick Langdock if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.

Try Langdock →

Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Frequently asked

Should I pick AutoGen or Langdock in 2026?+

Pick AutoGen if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Langdock if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use AutoGen for primary work and Langdock for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.

What's the price difference between AutoGen and Langdock?+

AutoGen starts at Free · OSS; Langdock starts at Subscription · from $30. AutoGen is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.

Which is more autonomous, AutoGen or Langdock?+

AutoGen is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.

Readers comparing AutoGen and Langdock also picked

Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.

  • CrewAIv0.86OSSB70

    役割ベースの自律AIエージェントを協調チームとしてオーケストレーションするオープンソースフレームワーク。

    ⚙️オペレーション自律型オープンソース
    マルチエージェントツール利用メモリ
    157k2024年1月15日crewai.com
    Demo · hover to play
  • LangChainのステートフル Multi-agent フレームワーク — 永続性とヒューマン・イン・ザ・ループを備えたグラフベースのオーケストレーション。

    ⚙️オペレーション自律型オープンソース
    マルチエージェントツール利用メモリ
    112k2024年6月18日langchain.com
    Demo · hover to play
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison
AutoGen vs Langdock (2026): which AI ops agent wins? · AI Agent Rank