Clay vs Fixie: 2026 comparison
Composable agents for enrichment, scoring and outbound orchestration.
Clay vs Fixie — specs
| Spec | Clay | Fixie |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 68 / 100 (B) | 72 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $149 | Free · OSS |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Browser, RAG | Tool use, RAG, Memory, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 5
- Polish & maturity
- 6
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 10
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Composable building blocks beat point tools — enrich + score + route in one
- +Strongest data-source coverage among GTM agents (50+ providers)
- +Highly programmable; sales ops loves the flexibility
- −Steep learning curve — not a one-day onboarding
- −Credit math gets opaque at scale
- −Less effective without a sales ops owner driving it
- +Real multi-agent primitives — planner + workers + reviewer out of the box
- +Strong for internal-tool agents over your own data
- +Permissive license; auditable end-to-end
- −Framework, not a finished product — engineering effort to ship anything
- −Smaller community than LangChain / LlamaIndex
- −Cloud pricing not yet published — usage-based and opaque
Pricing
- +Enrichment templates
- +5k credits/mo
- +CRM exports
- +25k credits/mo
- +Multi-source enrichment
- +Webhooks
- +Unlimited credits
- +Dedicated CS
- +SAML SSO
- +Apache-2.0 framework
- +Self-host
- +Bring your own models + data
- +Hosted runtime
- +Multi-agent orchestration
- +Observability
Which one should you pick?
Pick Fixie if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try Fixie →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Clay or Fixie in 2026?+
Pick Clay if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Fixie if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Most working teams running both can use Clay for primary work and Fixie for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Clay and Fixie?+
Clay starts at Subscription · from $149; Fixie starts at Free · OSS. Fixie is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Clay or Fixie?+
Both Clay and Fixie are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.