aiagentrank.io

Clay vs Glean: 2026 comparison

Composable agents for enrichment, scoring and outbound orchestration.

💼SalesSemi-autonomousSubscription · from $149
Tool useBrowserRAG

Enterprise AI worker — unified search, work assistant, and custom agents grounded in your company knowledge.

⚙️OpsAssistantSubscription
RAGMemoryTool use

Clay vs Glean — specs

SpecClayGlean
Agent Rank68 / 100 (B)80 / 100 (A)
AutonomySemi-autonomousAssistant
PricingSubscription · from $149Subscription · Free tier
Open sourceNoNo
CapabilitiesTool use, Browser, RAGRAG, Memory, Tool use
Integrations4 apps6 apps
VerifiedVerifiedVerified
ReleasedMar 2025Feb 2025

Categories: ClaySales · GleanOps

Agent Rank breakdown

Clay
Agent Rank
68/ 100
BB-tier
Autonomy fit
8
Capabilities
6
Integrations
6
Pricing value
5
Polish & maturity
6
Verifiability
10

Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?

Glean
Agent Rank
80/ 100
AA-tier
Autonomy fit
7
Capabilities
6
Integrations
10
Pricing value
9
Polish & maturity
6
Verifiability
10

Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?

Pros & cons

Clay
Pros
  • +Composable building blocks beat point tools — enrich + score + route in one
  • +Strongest data-source coverage among GTM agents (50+ providers)
  • +Highly programmable; sales ops loves the flexibility
Cons
  • Steep learning curve — not a one-day onboarding
  • Credit math gets opaque at scale
  • Less effective without a sales ops owner driving it
Glean
Pros
  • +Single best enterprise knowledge agent in 2026 — instant grounding in your company data
  • +Custom Agents (Glean Agents) let teams build internal workflows without code
  • +Strong permission-aware retrieval — agents see only what users are allowed to
Cons
  • Enterprise-only — typically $50K+ ACV minimum
  • Initial connector setup takes weeks for full coverage
  • Pricier than ChatGPT Enterprise on a per-seat basis

Pricing

Clay
Starter
$149/mo
Sales ops solo
  • +Enrichment templates
  • +5k credits/mo
  • +CRM exports
Recommended
Pro
$349/mo
Sales teams
  • +25k credits/mo
  • +Multi-source enrichment
  • +Webhooks
Enterprise
Custom
GTM teams
  • +Unlimited credits
  • +Dedicated CS
  • +SAML SSO
Glean
Recommended
Enterprise
Custom
Enterprises 200+ employees
  • +Unified search across 100+ apps
  • +Work assistant + custom agents
  • +SSO + enterprise data isolation

Which one should you pick?

Clay

Pick Clay if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.

Try Clay →
Glean

Pick Glean if cost is the main constraint.

Try Glean →

Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Frequently asked

Should I pick Clay or Glean in 2026?+

Pick Clay if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Glean if cost is the main constraint. Most working teams running both can use Clay for primary work and Glean for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.

What's the price difference between Clay and Glean?+

Clay starts at Subscription · from $149; Glean starts at Subscription · Free tier. Glean is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.

Which is more autonomous, Clay or Glean?+

Clay is the more autonomous of the two (Semi-autonomous vs Assistant). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.

Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison