Clay vs Manus: 2026 comparison
Composable agents for enrichment, scoring and outbound orchestration.
Clay vs Manus — specs
| Spec | Clay | Manus |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 68 / 100 (B) | 87 / 100 (S) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $149 | Freemium · from $19 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Browser, RAG | Browser, Tool use, Code, Memory, RAG |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Mar 2025 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 5
- Polish & maturity
- 6
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 10
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 9
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Composable building blocks beat point tools — enrich + score + route in one
- +Strongest data-source coverage among GTM agents (50+ providers)
- +Highly programmable; sales ops loves the flexibility
- −Steep learning curve — not a one-day onboarding
- −Credit math gets opaque at scale
- −Less effective without a sales ops owner driving it
- +Produces a finished artifact, not just a brief — slide decks, market maps, briefs
- +Strong browser + tool use; handles multi-source synthesis cleanly
- +AGENTS20 coupon stacks with annual billing
- −Confident on topics where the expert answer is "it depends"
- −Cites occasional fabricated sources — verify any high-stakes claim
- −Premium model gating means heavy users hit the $49 tier fast
Pricing
- +Enrichment templates
- +5k credits/mo
- +CRM exports
- +25k credits/mo
- +Multi-source enrichment
- +Webhooks
- +Unlimited credits
- +Dedicated CS
- +SAML SSO
- +100 daily credits
- +Standard models
- +Browser + tool use
- +Unlimited credits
- +Premium models
- +Faster queue
- +Priority support
- +5 seats
- +Shared workspaces
- +Admin controls
Which one should you pick?
Pick Manus if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Claim AGENTS20Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Clay or Manus in 2026?+
Pick Clay if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Browser) match what you need. Pick Manus if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Clay for primary work and Manus for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Clay and Manus?+
Clay starts at Subscription · from $149; Manus starts at Freemium · from $19. Manus is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Clay or Manus?+
Manus is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.