Clay vs Phind: 2026 comparison
Composable agents for enrichment, scoring and outbound orchestration.
Clay vs Phind — specs
| Spec | Clay | Phind |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 68 / 100 (B) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Assistant |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $149 | Freemium · from $20 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Browser, RAG | Browser, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 1 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 5
- Polish & maturity
- 6
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 7
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Composable building blocks beat point tools — enrich + score + route in one
- +Strongest data-source coverage among GTM agents (50+ providers)
- +Highly programmable; sales ops loves the flexibility
- −Steep learning curve — not a one-day onboarding
- −Credit math gets opaque at scale
- −Less effective without a sales ops owner driving it
- +Best dev-focused AI search — code-first results with citations
- +Citations are real and current; less hallucination than ChatGPT for code
- +VS Code extension brings Phind into the editor
- −Smaller index than Perplexity for non-dev queries
- −Best as a complement to a coding agent, not a replacement
- −Free tier limits make heavy daily use painful
Pricing
- +Enrichment templates
- +5k credits/mo
- +CRM exports
- +25k credits/mo
- +Multi-source enrichment
- +Webhooks
- +Unlimited credits
- +Dedicated CS
- +SAML SSO
- +Limited Pro searches/day
- +Standard models
- +Unlimited Pro searches
- +Frontier model access
- +Custom Phind agents
Which one should you pick?
Pick Clay if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint.
Try Clay →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Clay or Phind in 2026?+
Pick Clay if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint. Pick Phind if cost is the main constraint. Most working teams running both can use Clay for primary work and Phind for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Clay and Phind?+
Clay starts at Subscription · from $149; Phind starts at Freemium · from $20. Phind is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Clay or Phind?+
Clay is the more autonomous of the two (Semi-autonomous vs Assistant). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.