Clay vs Sourcegraph Cody: 2026 comparison
Composable agents for enrichment, scoring and outbound orchestration.
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Clay vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Clay | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 68 / 100 (B) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $149 | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Browser, RAG | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 5
- Polish & maturity
- 6
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 8
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Composable building blocks beat point tools — enrich + score + route in one
- +Strongest data-source coverage among GTM agents (50+ providers)
- +Highly programmable; sales ops loves the flexibility
- −Steep learning curve — not a one-day onboarding
- −Credit math gets opaque at scale
- −Less effective without a sales ops owner driving it
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
- +Enrichment templates
- +5k credits/mo
- +CRM exports
- +25k credits/mo
- +Multi-source enrichment
- +Webhooks
- +Unlimited credits
- +Dedicated CS
- +SAML SSO
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Clay or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Clay if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Browser) match what you need. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint. Most working teams running both can use Clay for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Clay and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Clay starts at Subscription · from $149; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Clay or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Both Clay and Sourcegraph Cody are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.