Clay vs Wordware: 2026 comparison
Composable agents for enrichment, scoring and outbound orchestration.
Clay vs Wordware — specs
| Spec | Clay | Wordware |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 68 / 100 (B) | 73 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $149 | Freemium · from $29 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Browser, RAG | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent, RAG |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Apr 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 5
- Polish & maturity
- 6
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 7
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Composable building blocks beat point tools — enrich + score + route in one
- +Strongest data-source coverage among GTM agents (50+ providers)
- +Highly programmable; sales ops loves the flexibility
- −Steep learning curve — not a one-day onboarding
- −Credit math gets opaque at scale
- −Less effective without a sales ops owner driving it
- +Document-like UI makes building agent workflows intuitive for non-engineers
- +Strong template library — copy a working workflow and modify
- +Genuinely useful for prototyping multi-step agent logic before coding it
- −Production-grade deployments still benefit from custom code
- −Pricing tiers can be confusing as workflows scale
- −Less polished observability than purpose-built agent platforms
Pricing
- +Enrichment templates
- +5k credits/mo
- +CRM exports
- +25k credits/mo
- +Multi-source enrichment
- +Webhooks
- +Unlimited credits
- +Dedicated CS
- +SAML SSO
- +Public workflows only
- +Community templates
- +Private workflows
- +Higher rate limits
- +Custom integrations
- +Shared workspace
- +Role-based access
- +API export
Which one should you pick?
Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Clay or Wordware in 2026?+
Pick Clay if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Browser) match what you need. Pick Wordware if cost is the main constraint. Most working teams running both can use Clay for primary work and Wordware for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Clay and Wordware?+
Clay starts at Subscription · from $149; Wordware starts at Freemium · from $29. Wordware is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Clay or Wordware?+
Both Clay and Wordware are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.