GitHub's AI pair-programmer — inline completions, chat, and the new Agent mode that ships PRs.
CodeTool useMemory
Demo · hover to play
Continue vs Cursor Agentwhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
Open-source coding agent for VS Code and JetBrains — bring your own model, customize every prompt.
CodeTool useMemory
Background agent that drives the Cursor editor across multi-file changes.
CodeTool useMemory
Continue vs Cursor Agent — specs
| Spec | Continue | Cursor Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 77 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Free · OSS | Subscription · from $20 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 2 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Apr 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Continue
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- Autonomy
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing
- 10
- Polish
- 8
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Cursor Agent
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- Autonomy
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing
- 8
- Polish
- 10
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
Continue
Pros
- +Apache 2.0 — fully open source; auditable end-to-end
- +Works with any OpenAI-compatible API endpoint, including local LLMs
- +JetBrains support that Cursor and Cline lack
Cons
- −Smaller community than Cursor or Cline
- −Less polished than Cursor; requires more configuration
- −No native MCP server marketplace — manual config required
Cursor Agent
Pros
- +Best-in-class editor-native UX — agent and inline tab-complete in the same tool
- +Lowest friction to start at $20/month
- +Cursor itself is the most-used editor among working engineers in 2026
Cons
- −Sessions don't survive a restart cleanly — long-running work breaks
- −Planning horizon is shorter than Devin's
- −Background-agent quotas can throttle on busy days
Pricing
Continue
Open source
Free
Engineers + teams
- +Apache 2.0 license
- +BYO model API key
- +VS Code + JetBrains support
Recommended
Hub
$20/mo
Teams sharing config
- +Shared models + assistants
- +Org-wide rules and prompts
- +Usage analytics
Cursor Agent
Hobby
Free
Casual users
- +Limited agent runs
- +Full editor features
- +Community support
Recommended
Pro
$20/mo
Working engineers
- +Unlimited agent runs
- +All Pro models
- +Background agents
- +Priority support
Business
$40/seat/mo
Teams 5+
- +Everything in Pro
- +Admin dashboard
- +SSO
- +Usage analytics
- +SOC 2
Which one should you pick?
Continue
Pick Continue if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try Continue →Cursor Agent
Pick Cursor Agent if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need.
Try Cursor Agent →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Continue or Cursor Agent in 2026?+
Pick Continue if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Pick Cursor Agent if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Continue for primary work and Cursor Agent for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Continue and Cursor Agent?+
Continue starts at Free · OSS; Cursor Agent starts at Subscription · from $20. Continue is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Continue or Cursor Agent?+
Both Continue and Cursor Agent are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Continue and Cursor Agent also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
AWS's enterprise AI agent — coding assistant, business chat, and customizable Q apps grounded in your AWS data.
CodeTool useRAGMemoryDemo · hover to playAutonomous coding agent grounded in your whole codebase — multi-file edits with deep context.
CodeTool useMemoryRAG
See more alternatives: alternatives to Continue · alternatives to Cursor Agent
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison