Continue vs Decagon: 2026 comparison
Open-source coding agent for VS Code and JetBrains — bring your own model, customize every prompt.
Continue vs Decagon — specs
| Spec | Continue | Decagon |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 75 / 100 (A) | 72 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Free · OSS | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory | Tool use, Memory, RAG |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Apr 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 10
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Apache 2.0 — fully open source; auditable end-to-end
- +Works with any OpenAI-compatible API endpoint, including local LLMs
- +JetBrains support that Cursor and Cline lack
- −Smaller community than Cursor or Cline
- −Less polished than Cursor; requires more configuration
- −No native MCP server marketplace — manual config required
- +Chat-first agent with consistently 65–75% tier-1 deflection in production
- +Deep integration with existing helpdesks (Zendesk / Intercom / Salesforce)
- +Mid-market priced — easier conversation than Sierra
- −Voice support exists but is not the strength
- −Sales-led — no self-serve sign-up
- −Per-resolution pricing can sting if tickets spike unexpectedly
Pricing
- +Apache 2.0 license
- +BYO model API key
- +VS Code + JetBrains support
- +Shared models + assistants
- +Org-wide rules and prompts
- +Usage analytics
- +Per-resolution pricing
- +Zendesk / Intercom integration
- +Onboarding included
- +Custom integrations
- +SSO + audit log
- +Dedicated CSM
Which one should you pick?
Pick Continue if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try Continue →Pick Decagon if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Decagon →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Continue or Decagon in 2026?+
Pick Continue if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Pick Decagon if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Continue for primary work and Decagon for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Continue and Decagon?+
Continue starts at Free · OSS; Decagon starts at Subscription · Free tier. Continue is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Continue or Decagon?+
Decagon is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.