Devin vs Magic.dev: 2026 comparison
Autonomous AI software engineer that ships PRs end-to-end.
Devin vs Magic.dev — specs
| Spec | Devin | Magic.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 78 / 100 (A) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $500 | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Browser, Memory | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 2 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | May 2025 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 4
- Polish & maturity
- 10
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 4
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Highest autonomy in the coding category — ships PRs end-to-end with minimal oversight
- +Iterates on failing tests until they pass; explains what it did in the PR description
- +Multi-agent UI for managing parallel sessions
- −Pricing puts it firmly in team territory — overkill for solo founders
- −Will ship working code that's wrong for your codebase if architectural context is missing
- −Session memory weak past hour-long stretches
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
Pricing
- +Unlimited sessions
- +Slack + GitHub + Linear integrations
- +10 concurrent sessions
- +Email support
- +Everything in Core
- +Priority queue
- +40 concurrent sessions
- +SSO
- +Shared knowledge base
- +Custom concurrency
- +Dedicated VPC option
- +SOC 2 II reports
- +Onboarding engineer
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
Which one should you pick?
Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Devin or Magic.dev in 2026?+
Pick Devin if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint. Most working teams running both can use Devin for primary work and Magic.dev for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Devin and Magic.dev?+
Devin starts at Subscription · from $500; Magic.dev starts at Subscription · Free tier. Magic.dev is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Devin or Magic.dev?+
Both Devin and Magic.dev are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.