単一のプロンプトから完全なアプリケーションをビルドしてリリース — Replit クラウド上で動作します。
コード実行ツール利用ブラウザ操作メモリ
Demo · hover to play
Devin vs Magic.devwhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
Autonomous AI software engineer that ships PRs end-to-end.
CodeTool useBrowserMemory
Devin vs Magic.dev — specs
| Spec | Devin | Magic.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 78 / 100 (A) | 68 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $500 | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Browser, Memory | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 2 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | May 2025 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Devin
Agent Rank
78/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 4
- 完成度
- 10
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Magic.dev
Agent Rank
68/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 2
- 料金
- 9
- 完成度
- 5
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Devin
メリット
- +Highest autonomy in the coding category — ships PRs end-to-end with minimal oversight
- +Iterates on failing tests until they pass; explains what it did in the PR description
- +Multi-agent UI for managing parallel sessions
デメリット
- −Pricing puts it firmly in team territory — overkill for solo founders
- −Will ship working code that's wrong for your codebase if architectural context is missing
- −Session memory weak past hour-long stretches
Magic.dev
メリット
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
デメリット
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
Pricing
Devin
Core
$500/月
Small teams
- +Unlimited sessions
- +Slack + GitHub + Linear integrations
- +10 concurrent sessions
- +Email support
おすすめ
Team
$1500/月
Engineering teams
- +Everything in Core
- +Priority queue
- +40 concurrent sessions
- +SSO
- +Shared knowledge base
Enterprise
カスタム
Large orgs
- +Custom concurrency
- +Dedicated VPC option
- +SOC 2 II reports
- +Onboarding engineer
Magic.dev
Enterprise
カスタム
Engineering teams
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
Which one should you pick?
Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Devin or Magic.dev in 2026?+
Pick Devin if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint. Most working teams running both can use Devin for primary work and Magic.dev for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Devin and Magic.dev?+
Devin starts at Subscription · from $500; Magic.dev starts at Subscription · Free tier. Magic.dev is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Devin or Magic.dev?+
Both Devin and Magic.dev are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Devin and Magic.dev also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
Autonomous "Droid" agent for end-to-end engineering with native AGENTS.md support.
コード実行ツール利用メモリマルチエージェント
Demo · hover to playGitHubの自然言語マイクロアプリビルダー — 個人用アプリを説明するだけで、デプロイ済みの動作バージョンを取得できます。
コード実行ツール利用メモリ
Demo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Devin · alternatives to Magic.dev
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison