aiagentrank.io

Adept vs Sardinewhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?

Browser-driving AI agent — completes multi-step workflows on real web apps the way a human would.

⚙️OpsAutonomousSubscription
BrowserTool useMemoryVision

Agentic financial-crime ops — consolidates 11 fraud/KYC vendors, auto-reviews 40% of applications.

⚙️OpsAutonomousSubscription
Tool useMemoryRAGMulti-agent

Adept vs Sardine — specs

SpecAdeptSardine
Agent Rank67 / 100 (B)67 / 100 (B)
AutonomyAutonomousAutonomous
PricingSubscription · Free tierSubscription
Open sourceNoNo
CapabilitiesBrowser, Tool use, Memory, VisionTool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent
Integrations3 apps4 apps
Verified
ReleasedApr 2025Jan 2025

Categories: AdeptOps · SardineOps

Agent Rank breakdown

Adept
Agent Rank
67/ 100
BB-tier
Autonomie
9
Fähigkeiten
8
Integrationen
4
Preise
9
Reife
4
Verifizierbarkeit
6

Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?

Sardine
Agent Rank
67/ 100
BB-tier
Autonomie
9
Fähigkeiten
8
Integrationen
6
Preise
4
Reife
7
Verifizierbarkeit
6

Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?

Pros & cons

Adept
Pros
  • +Pioneering work on UI-driven browser agents — strong research lineage
  • +Best for fully-autonomous, multi-step workflows that cross web apps
  • +Foundation models tuned specifically for browser action prediction
Cons
  • Not generally available — enterprise pilots only as of mid-2026
  • Pricing not public
  • Reliability on long-tail UIs still a work in progress
Sardine
Pros
  • +$145M total (a16z) — top of the agentic financial-crime category
  • +Consolidates 11 fraud/KYC/AML vendors into one platform
  • +Auto-reviews 40% of monthly applications — major cost reduction
Cons
  • Enterprise focus — not priced for SMB fintechs
  • Regulatory complexity requires legal review per deployment
  • Best ROI requires existing high-volume transaction flow

Pricing

Adept
Enterprise preview
Individuell
Enterprise pilots
  • +Browser-driving agent
  • +Custom workflow training
  • +Dedicated research-eng support
Sardine
Growth
Individuell
Mid-market fintechs
  • +Fraud + AML core agents
  • +4 integrations
  • +Standard SLA
Empfohlen
Enterprise
Individuell
Large banks + fintechs
  • +Full agent suite
  • +Unlimited integrations
  • +Custom rules engine
Sovereign
Individuell
Regulated
  • +EU/US data residency
  • +On-prem option
  • +Dedicated CS

Which one should you pick?

Adept

Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint.

Try Adept →
Sardine

Pick Sardine if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.

Try Sardine →

Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Frequently asked

Should I pick Adept or Sardine in 2026?+

Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint. Pick Sardine if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Adept for primary work and Sardine for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.

What's the price difference between Adept and Sardine?+

Adept starts at Subscription · Free tier; Sardine starts at Subscription. Adept is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.

Which is more autonomous, Adept or Sardine?+

Both Adept and Sardine are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.

Readers comparing Adept and Sardine also picked

Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.

Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison
Adept vs Sardine (2026): which AI ops agent wins? · AI Agent Rank