Webタスクを自律的に完了するブラウザ操作AIエージェント — 予約、購入、リサーチに対応。
ブラウザ操作ツール利用ビジョンメモリ
Demo · hover to play
Adept vs Sardinewhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Browser-driving AI agent — completes multi-step workflows on real web apps the way a human would.
BrowserTool useMemoryVision
Adept vs Sardine — specs
| Spec | Adept | Sardine |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Browser, Tool use, Memory, Vision | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | — | — |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Adept
Agent Rank
67/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 9
- 完成度
- 4
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Sardine
Agent Rank
67/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 4
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Adept
メリット
- +Pioneering work on UI-driven browser agents — strong research lineage
- +Best for fully-autonomous, multi-step workflows that cross web apps
- +Foundation models tuned specifically for browser action prediction
デメリット
- −Not generally available — enterprise pilots only as of mid-2026
- −Pricing not public
- −Reliability on long-tail UIs still a work in progress
Sardine
メリット
- +$145M total (a16z) — top of the agentic financial-crime category
- +Consolidates 11 fraud/KYC/AML vendors into one platform
- +Auto-reviews 40% of monthly applications — major cost reduction
デメリット
- −Enterprise focus — not priced for SMB fintechs
- −Regulatory complexity requires legal review per deployment
- −Best ROI requires existing high-volume transaction flow
Pricing
Adept
Enterprise preview
カスタム
Enterprise pilots
- +Browser-driving agent
- +Custom workflow training
- +Dedicated research-eng support
Sardine
Growth
カスタム
Mid-market fintechs
- +Fraud + AML core agents
- +4 integrations
- +Standard SLA
おすすめ
Enterprise
カスタム
Large banks + fintechs
- +Full agent suite
- +Unlimited integrations
- +Custom rules engine
Sovereign
カスタム
Regulated
- +EU/US data residency
- +On-prem option
- +Dedicated CS
Which one should you pick?
Sardine
Pick Sardine if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Sardine →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Adept or Sardine in 2026?+
Pick Adept if cost is the main constraint. Pick Sardine if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Adept for primary work and Sardine for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Adept and Sardine?+
Adept starts at Subscription · Free tier; Sardine starts at Subscription. Adept is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Adept or Sardine?+
Both Adept and Sardine are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Adept and Sardine also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
画面を認識し、カーソルを動かし、入力や操作を自律的に実行するコンピューター操作機能を備えたClaude。
ブラウザ操作ツール利用ビジョンメモリ
Demo · hover to playあなたに代わってウェブを閲覧するパーソナルAIエージェント — フライトの予約、フォームの入力、タスクの自律的な完了が可能です。
ブラウザ操作ツール利用ビジョンメモリDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Adept · alternatives to Sardine
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison