Enterprise "Agent OS" with trust, memory, and multi-agent coordination — built by ex-Atlassian CTO.
Tool-NutzungMemoryRAGMulti-Agent
Dust vs Make.com Agentswhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed company-wide agents across your stack.
Tool useMemoryRAGMulti-agent
Visual workflow automation with AI agents — drag-and-drop scenarios across 2,000+ apps.
Tool useMemoryMulti-agent
Dust vs Make.com Agents — specs
| Spec | Dust | Make.com Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 85 / 100 (S) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $29 | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 5 apps | 8 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Dust
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- Autonomie
- 8
- Fähigkeiten
- 8
- Integrationen
- 10
- Preise
- 7
- Reife
- 7
- Verifizierbarkeit
- 6
Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?
Make.com Agents
Agent Rank
85/ 100
- Autonomie
- 8
- Fähigkeiten
- 6
- Integrationen
- 10
- Preise
- 8
- Reife
- 9
- Verifizierbarkeit
- 10
Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?
Pros & cons
Dust
Pros
- +"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed workspaces designed for company-wide use
- +$40M Series B (Sequoia, Snowflake, Datadog) signals strong enterprise validation
- +Deepest connector library among agent platforms (Slack/Notion/GitHub/Salesforce/GDrive)
Cons
- −French roots — strongest support in EU/UK time zones
- −Higher per-seat pricing than Glean for read-only retrieval use cases
- −Custom agent authoring requires technical user (less low-code than Gumloop)
Make.com Agents
Pros
- +Visual scenario builder is the most accessible automation tool besides Zapier
- +Cheapest AI-agent automation tier on the market ($9)
- +Strong on multi-step branching scenarios where Zapier feels limiting
Cons
- −Operations math is opaque at first — every step costs ops
- −Smaller AI feature set than Lindy / Relay built-from-scratch agent platforms
- −European data residency only on paid tiers
Pricing
Dust
Free
Kostenlos
Individuals
- +1 workspace
- +3 agents
- +GPT-4o + Claude 3.5
Empfohlen
Pro
$29/Sitz/Mo.
Teams
- +Unlimited agents
- +All integrations
- +Custom data sources
Enterprise
Individuell
Large orgs
- +SSO + audit
- +Custom retention
- +Dedicated tenants
Make.com Agents
Free
Kostenlos
Trial
- +1,000 operations/mo
- +No agent features
- +2 active scenarios
Empfohlen
Core
$9/Mo.
Solo / small teams
- +10,000 ops/mo
- +AI agent nodes
- +Webhooks + schedules
Pro
$16/Mo.
Heavy users
- +10,000 ops base + add-ons
- +Priority queue
- +Custom variables
Teams
$29/Sitz/Mo.
Teams
- +Shared scenarios
- +Roles + admin
- +Higher ops base
Which one should you pick?
Make.com Agents
Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint.
Try Make.com Agents →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Dust or Make.com Agents in 2026?+
Pick Dust if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Pick Make.com Agents if cost is the main constraint or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint. Most working teams running both can use Dust for primary work and Make.com Agents for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Dust and Make.com Agents?+
Dust starts at Subscription · from $29; Make.com Agents starts at Freemium · from $9. Make.com Agents is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Dust or Make.com Agents?+
Both Dust and Make.com Agents are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Dust and Make.com Agents also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
GDPR-native multi-model AI workspace with built-in agent builder — Europe's Glean alternative.
Tool-NutzungMemoryRAGMulti-Agent
Demo · hover to playEnterprise-KI-Worker — einheitliche Suche, Arbeitsassistent und individuelle KI-Agenten, verankert in Ihrem Unternehmenswissen.
RAGMemoryTool-NutzungDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Dust · alternatives to Make.com Agents
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison