Enterprise "Agent OS" with trust, memory, and multi-agent coordination — built by ex-Atlassian CTO.
Dust vs n8n Agentswhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed company-wide agents across your stack.
Open-source workflow automation with first-class AI agent nodes — self-host or use cloud.
Dust vs n8n Agents — specs
| Spec | Dust | n8n Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 87 / 100 (S) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $29 | Free · OSS |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 5 apps | 6 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomie
- 8
- Fähigkeiten
- 8
- Integrationen
- 10
- Preise
- 7
- Reife
- 7
- Verifizierbarkeit
- 6
Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?
- Autonomie
- 8
- Fähigkeiten
- 6
- Integrationen
- 10
- Preise
- 10
- Reife
- 8
- Verifizierbarkeit
- 10
Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?
Pros & cons
- +"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed workspaces designed for company-wide use
- +$40M Series B (Sequoia, Snowflake, Datadog) signals strong enterprise validation
- +Deepest connector library among agent platforms (Slack/Notion/GitHub/Salesforce/GDrive)
- −French roots — strongest support in EU/UK time zones
- −Higher per-seat pricing than Glean for read-only retrieval use cases
- −Custom agent authoring requires technical user (less low-code than Gumloop)
- +Strongest OSS workflow automation in 2026 — production-ready at any scale
- +Self-host keeps proprietary data on your infra
- +Multi-agent + AI agent nodes are first-class, not bolted on
- −Steeper learning curve than Zapier
- −Cloud pricing is competitive but self-host operational overhead is real
- −Community support primary; commercial SLA is paid tier
Pricing
- +1 workspace
- +3 agents
- +GPT-4o + Claude 3.5
- +Unlimited agents
- +All integrations
- +Custom data sources
- +SSO + audit
- +Custom retention
- +Dedicated tenants
- +Apache-2.0 fair-use license
- +Unlimited workflows
- +Full agent node support
- +Hosted runtime
- +Active workflows
- +BYO LLM key supported
- +10K executions/mo
- +Multi-user
- +Workflow versioning
Which one should you pick?
Pick n8n Agents if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try n8n Agents →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Dust or n8n Agents in 2026?+
Pick Dust if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Pick n8n Agents if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Most working teams running both can use Dust for primary work and n8n Agents for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Dust and n8n Agents?+
Dust starts at Subscription · from $29; n8n Agents starts at Free · OSS. n8n Agents is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Dust or n8n Agents?+
Both Dust and n8n Agents are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Dust and n8n Agents also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- Tool-NutzungMemoryRAGMulti-Agent
GDPR-native multi-model AI workspace with built-in agent builder — Europe's Glean alternative.
Tool-NutzungMemoryRAGMulti-Agent
Demo · hover to playVisuelle Workflow-Automatisierung mit KI-Agenten – Drag-and-Drop-Szenarien für 2.000+ Apps.
Tool-NutzungMemoryMulti-AgentDemo · hover to play