Enterprise "Agent OS" with trust, memory, and multi-agent coordination — built by ex-Atlassian CTO.
Tool-NutzungMemoryRAGMulti-Agent
Dust vs Sourcegraph Codywhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed company-wide agents across your stack.
Tool useMemoryRAGMulti-agent
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
CodeTool useRAGMemory
Dust vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Dust | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 77 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $29 | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 5 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Dust
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- Autonomie
- 8
- Fähigkeiten
- 8
- Integrationen
- 10
- Preise
- 7
- Reife
- 7
- Verifizierbarkeit
- 6
Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?
Sourcegraph Cody
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- Autonomie
- 8
- Fähigkeiten
- 8
- Integrationen
- 4
- Preise
- 8
- Reife
- 8
- Verifizierbarkeit
- 10
Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?
Pros & cons
Dust
Pros
- +"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed workspaces designed for company-wide use
- +$40M Series B (Sequoia, Snowflake, Datadog) signals strong enterprise validation
- +Deepest connector library among agent platforms (Slack/Notion/GitHub/Salesforce/GDrive)
Cons
- −French roots — strongest support in EU/UK time zones
- −Higher per-seat pricing than Glean for read-only retrieval use cases
- −Custom agent authoring requires technical user (less low-code than Gumloop)
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
Cons
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
Dust
Free
Kostenlos
Individuals
- +1 workspace
- +3 agents
- +GPT-4o + Claude 3.5
Empfohlen
Pro
$29/Sitz/Mo.
Teams
- +Unlimited agents
- +All integrations
- +Custom data sources
Enterprise
Individuell
Large orgs
- +SSO + audit
- +Custom retention
- +Dedicated tenants
Sourcegraph Cody
Free
Kostenlos
Personal use
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
Empfohlen
Pro
$9/Mo.
Solo devs
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
Enterprise
$19/Sitz/Mo.
Engineering teams
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Sourcegraph Cody
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Sourcegraph Cody →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Dust or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Dust if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Dust for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Dust and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Dust starts at Subscription · from $29; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Dust or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Both Dust and Sourcegraph Cody are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Dust and Sourcegraph Cody also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
GDPR-native multi-model AI workspace with built-in agent builder — Europe's Glean alternative.
Tool-NutzungMemoryRAGMulti-Agent
Demo · hover to playVisuelle Workflow-Automatisierung mit KI-Agenten – Drag-and-Drop-Szenarien für 2.000+ Apps.
Tool-NutzungMemoryMulti-AgentDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Dust · alternatives to Sourcegraph Cody
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison