Enterprise "Agent OS" with trust, memory, and multi-agent coordination — built by ex-Atlassian CTO.
Dust vs Sourcegraph Codywhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed company-wide agents across your stack.
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Dust vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Dust | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 77 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $29 | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 5 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 10
- 料金
- 7
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 8
- 完成度
- 8
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
- +"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed workspaces designed for company-wide use
- +$40M Series B (Sequoia, Snowflake, Datadog) signals strong enterprise validation
- +Deepest connector library among agent platforms (Slack/Notion/GitHub/Salesforce/GDrive)
- −French roots — strongest support in EU/UK time zones
- −Higher per-seat pricing than Glean for read-only retrieval use cases
- −Custom agent authoring requires technical user (less low-code than Gumloop)
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
- +1 workspace
- +3 agents
- +GPT-4o + Claude 3.5
- +Unlimited agents
- +All integrations
- +Custom data sources
- +SSO + audit
- +Custom retention
- +Dedicated tenants
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Sourcegraph Cody →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Dust or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Dust if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Dust for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Dust and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Dust starts at Subscription · from $29; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Dust or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Both Dust and Sourcegraph Cody are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Dust and Sourcegraph Cody also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- ツール利用メモリRAGマルチエージェント
GDPR-native multi-model AI workspace with built-in agent builder — Europe's Glean alternative.
ツール利用メモリRAGマルチエージェント
Demo · hover to playAIエージェント搭載のビジュアルWorkflow自動化 — 2,000以上のアプリをまたぐドラッグ&ドロップシナリオ。
ツール利用メモリマルチエージェントDemo · hover to play