KI-Kundenservice-Agent — löst Tickets über Chat, E-Mail und Sprache mit messbaren Ticket-Deflection-Raten.
Intercom Fin vs Legorawhich AI support agent should you pick in 2026?
Resolution-based AI agent built into Intercom — pays for what it actually deflects.
Intercom Fin vs Legora — specs
| Spec | Intercom Fin | Legora |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 75 / 100 (A) | 58 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Pay per task · from $1 | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | RAG, Tool use, Memory | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Jan 2025 | Aug 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomie
- 9
- Fähigkeiten
- 6
- Integrationen
- 4
- Preise
- 8
- Reife
- 8
- Verifizierbarkeit
- 10
Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?
- Autonomie
- 8
- Fähigkeiten
- 8
- Integrationen
- 2
- Preise
- 4
- Reife
- 7
- Verifizierbarkeit
- 6
Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?
Pros & cons
- +Outcome-based pricing — you only pay for tickets it actually resolves
- +Deepest integration with Intercom; trivial to deploy if you already use it
- +Strong multi-language support out of the box
- −Lock-in to Intercom ecosystem; less appealing if you live in Zendesk
- −Per-resolution math can be unpredictable at burst-traffic spikes
- −Voice support exists but lags Parloa / Sierra for that channel
- +$5.55B valuation Series D Apr 2026 — largest legal-AI Series D in history
- +Multi-agent collaboration (different agents for different transaction types)
- +Strong UK/EU foothold with Magic Circle firm adoption
- −Newer than Harvey in US market — fewer NYC AmLaw 100 case studies
- −Enterprise pricing only — no associate-level self-serve
- −Best suited for transactional law (M&A, finance) — less for litigation
Pricing
- +$0.99 per resolved conversation
- +Native Intercom integration
- +Multi-source knowledge
- +Volume pricing
- +Multi-region data residency
- +Dedicated success manager
- +Contract review agent
- +Due diligence
- +Word + SharePoint
- +Multi-agent workflows
- +iManage/NetDocs sync
- +Advanced security
- +EU/US/UK data residency
- +BYO LLM option
- +Dedicated tenants
Which one should you pick?
Pick Intercom Fin if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Intercom Fin →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Intercom Fin or Legora in 2026?+
Pick Intercom Fin if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Legora if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Intercom Fin for primary work and Legora for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Intercom Fin and Legora?+
Intercom Fin starts at Pay per task · from $1; Legora starts at Subscription. Intercom Fin is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Intercom Fin or Legora?+
Intercom Fin is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Intercom Fin and Legora also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- RAGTool-NutzungMemorySpracheDemo · hover to play
Konversationelle Support-KI-Agenten, die Tickets wie Ihre besten Mitarbeiter lösen.
Tool-NutzungMemoryRAGDemo · hover to playMultilingual customer-support AI agents with local deployment teams in 30 countries.
Tool-NutzungMemorySpracheRAG