Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing
- 4
- Polish
- 7
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Capabilities
- Voice
- Memory
- RAG
Integrations
- Other
- EpicCernerMeditechAthena
Pricing tiers
- +Note generation
- +Epic integration
- +5 specialties
- +Full specialty coverage
- +CDI + coding insights
- +Enterprise SSO
- +Unlimited providers
- +Custom workflows
- +Strategic CS
Pros & cons
- +$5.3B valuation with Series F closed Feb 2026 โ most-funded healthcare AI agent
- +Epic + Cerner + Meditech native โ covers >90% of US EHR market
- +Generates SOAP notes + billing codes + CDI flags in a single pass
- โUS-focused โ EU expansion in early stages
- โEnterprise sales only โ no self-serve for individual doctors
- โHeavy dependence on EHR partnership stability (Epic UGM relationship)
Clinical-documentation agent that turns doctor-patient encounters into compliant EHR notes. Start with the subscription tier.
Frequently asked questions
What is Abridge?+
Abridge is a clinical-documentation AI agent. It listens to doctor-patient encounters and generates compliant SOAP notes, billing codes, and CDI flags in real time inside Epic, Cerner, and Meditech.
Abridge vs Suki?+
Both are clinical voice agents. Abridge has deeper EHR integration and a larger funding base ($5.3B vs Suki's $168M); Suki is more accessible for smaller practices and solo providers.
Is patient data secure?+
Yes โ Abridge is HIPAA-compliant with signed BAA, end-to-end encryption, and a default policy of no patient data used for model training without explicit organizational consent.
User reviews
Write a review โBe the first to review. We verify every reviewer by email.
