Décomposition de l'Agent Rank
- Autonomie
- 9
- Capacités
- 6
- Intégrations
- 2
- Tarification
- 4
- Maturité
- 7
- Vérifiabilité
- 6
Calculé automatiquement à partir de l'autonomie, des capacités, des intégrations, de la tarification, de la maturité et de la vérification éditoriale. Mis à jour à chaque déploiement. Comment est-ce calculé ?
Capacités
- Voix
- Memory
- RAG
Intégrations
- Other
- EpicCernerAthenaMeditech
Niveaux de tarification
- +Ambient documentation
- +35+ languages
- +Standard EHR sync
- +Multi-clinician shared workspaces
- +Full EHR integration
- +Specialty templates
- +Custom workflows
- +AMI Labs agentic roadmap
- +Strategic CS
Pour & contre
- +$70M Series C; 85K+ clinicians across 150+ orgs including 24K at Permanente
- +35+ languages out of the box — strongest multilingual clinical scribe
- +Partnership with Yann LeCun's AMI Labs for agentic clinical roadmap
- −EU-headquartered (Paris) — US Epic UGM relationship not as deep as Abridge
- −Pricing not public — sales-led motion
- −Smaller US health-system case-study library than Abridge/Suki
Ambient clinical agent for documentation, coding, and EHR workflows in 35+ languages. Commencez avec le tier abonnement.
Questions fréquentes
What is Nabla?+
Nabla is an ambient clinical AI agent for documentation, coding, and EHR workflows in 35+ languages. $70M Series C; 85K+ clinicians across 150+ organizations.
Nabla vs Abridge?+
Both are clinical voice agents. Abridge has deeper US Epic integration and larger funding ($5.3B val); Nabla wins on multilingual (35+ languages) and has stronger EU adoption.
Which languages does Nabla support?+
Nabla supports 35+ languages including English, French, German, Spanish, Italian, Hebrew, Arabic, Japanese, Mandarin, Korean, and most major European + Asian languages.
Reviews utilisateurs
Écrire une review →Be the first to review. We verify every reviewer by email.
