Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 2
- Pricing
- 4
- Polish
- 7
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Capabilities
- Voice
- Memory
- RAG
Integrations
- Other
- EpicCernerAthenaMeditech
Pricing tiers
- +Ambient documentation
- +35+ languages
- +Standard EHR sync
- +Multi-clinician shared workspaces
- +Full EHR integration
- +Specialty templates
- +Custom workflows
- +AMI Labs agentic roadmap
- +Strategic CS
Pros & cons
- +$70M Series C; 85K+ clinicians across 150+ orgs including 24K at Permanente
- +35+ languages out of the box โ strongest multilingual clinical scribe
- +Partnership with Yann LeCun's AMI Labs for agentic clinical roadmap
- โEU-headquartered (Paris) โ US Epic UGM relationship not as deep as Abridge
- โPricing not public โ sales-led motion
- โSmaller US health-system case-study library than Abridge/Suki
Ambient clinical agent for documentation, coding, and EHR workflows in 35+ languages. Start with the subscription tier.
Frequently asked questions
What is Nabla?+
Nabla is an ambient clinical AI agent for documentation, coding, and EHR workflows in 35+ languages. $70M Series C; 85K+ clinicians across 150+ organizations.
Nabla vs Abridge?+
Both are clinical voice agents. Abridge has deeper US Epic integration and larger funding ($5.3B val); Nabla wins on multilingual (35+ languages) and has stronger EU adoption.
Which languages does Nabla support?+
Nabla supports 35+ languages including English, French, German, Spanish, Italian, Hebrew, Arabic, Japanese, Mandarin, Korean, and most major European + Asian languages.
User reviews
Write a review โBe the first to review. We verify every reviewer by email.
