Software engineer IA autonome qui livre des PR end-to-end.
Exécution de codeTool UseBrowser UseMemory
Demo · hover to play
Magic.dev vs OpenHandswhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
Autonomous AI engineer trained on long contexts — handles hour-long coding sessions without losing track.
CodeTool useMemory
Magic.dev vs OpenHands — specs
| Spec | Magic.dev | OpenHands |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 68 / 100 (B) | 77 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Free · OSS |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory | Code, Tool use, Browser, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 2 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | May 2025 | Jun 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Magic.dev
Agent Rank
68/ 100
- Autonomie
- 9
- Capacités
- 6
- Intégrations
- 2
- Tarification
- 9
- Maturité
- 5
- Vérifiabilité
- 10
Calculé automatiquement à partir de l'autonomie, des capacités, des intégrations, de la tarification, de la maturité et de la vérification éditoriale. Mis à jour à chaque déploiement. Comment est-ce calculé ?
OpenHands
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- Autonomie
- 9
- Capacités
- 8
- Intégrations
- 6
- Tarification
- 10
- Maturité
- 7
- Vérifiabilité
- 6
Calculé automatiquement à partir de l'autonomie, des capacités, des intégrations, de la tarification, de la maturité et de la vérification éditoriale. Mis à jour à chaque déploiement. Comment est-ce calculé ?
Pros & cons
Magic.dev
Pour
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
Contre
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
OpenHands
Pour
- +73K+ GitHub stars — the most popular OSS coding agent (formerly OpenDevin)
- +Self-hostable with full data control — runs locally in Docker
- +Active community + plugin ecosystem; $18.8M Series A backs ongoing development
Contre
- −Setup more involved than commercial alternatives like Cursor
- −Hosted Cloud tier still maturing relative to Devin / Factory
- −BYO model API — costs separate from the platform itself
Pricing
Magic.dev
Enterprise
Sur mesure
Engineering teams
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
OpenHands
Self-hosted
Gratuit
Anyone
- +Full OSS code (MIT)
- +Docker sandbox
- +BYO model API
Recommandé
Cloud Pro
$20/mois
Solo devs
- +Hosted sandbox
- +GitHub integration
- +Claude / GPT included
Cloud Team
$50/siège/mois
Teams
- +Shared workspaces
- +Audit logs
- +Priority compute
Which one should you pick?
Magic.dev
Pick Magic.dev if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Magic.dev →OpenHands
Pick OpenHands if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try OpenHands →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Magic.dev or OpenHands in 2026?+
Pick Magic.dev if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick OpenHands if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Most working teams running both can use Magic.dev for primary work and OpenHands for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Magic.dev and OpenHands?+
Magic.dev starts at Subscription · Free tier; OpenHands starts at Free · OSS. OpenHands is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Magic.dev or OpenHands?+
Both Magic.dev and OpenHands are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Magic.dev and OpenHands also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
Créez et déployez des applications complètes depuis un seul prompt — fonctionne dans le cloud Replit.
Exécution de codeTool UseBrowser UseMemoryDemo · hover to playConstructeur de micro-applications en langage naturel de GitHub — décrivez une application personnelle, obtenez une version fonctionnelle déployée.
Exécution de codeTool UseMemory
Demo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Magic.dev · alternatives to OpenHands
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison