エンドツーエンドでPRを完結させる、自律的なAIソフトウェアエンジニアです。
コード実行ツール利用ブラウザ操作メモリ
Demo · hover to play
Magic.dev vs OpenHandswhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
Autonomous AI engineer trained on long contexts — handles hour-long coding sessions without losing track.
CodeTool useMemory
Magic.dev vs OpenHands — specs
| Spec | Magic.dev | OpenHands |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 68 / 100 (B) | 77 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Free · OSS |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory | Code, Tool use, Browser, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 2 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | May 2025 | Jun 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Magic.dev
Agent Rank
68/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 2
- 料金
- 9
- 完成度
- 5
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
OpenHands
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 10
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Magic.dev
メリット
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
デメリット
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
OpenHands
メリット
- +73K+ GitHub stars — the most popular OSS coding agent (formerly OpenDevin)
- +Self-hostable with full data control — runs locally in Docker
- +Active community + plugin ecosystem; $18.8M Series A backs ongoing development
デメリット
- −Setup more involved than commercial alternatives like Cursor
- −Hosted Cloud tier still maturing relative to Devin / Factory
- −BYO model API — costs separate from the platform itself
Pricing
Magic.dev
Enterprise
カスタム
Engineering teams
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
OpenHands
Self-hosted
無料
Anyone
- +Full OSS code (MIT)
- +Docker sandbox
- +BYO model API
おすすめ
Cloud Pro
$20/月
Solo devs
- +Hosted sandbox
- +GitHub integration
- +Claude / GPT included
Cloud Team
$50/席/月
Teams
- +Shared workspaces
- +Audit logs
- +Priority compute
Which one should you pick?
Magic.dev
Pick Magic.dev if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Magic.dev →OpenHands
Pick OpenHands if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try OpenHands →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Magic.dev or OpenHands in 2026?+
Pick Magic.dev if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick OpenHands if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Most working teams running both can use Magic.dev for primary work and OpenHands for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Magic.dev and OpenHands?+
Magic.dev starts at Subscription · Free tier; OpenHands starts at Free · OSS. OpenHands is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Magic.dev or OpenHands?+
Both Magic.dev and OpenHands are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Magic.dev and OpenHands also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
単一のプロンプトから完全なアプリケーションをビルドしてリリース — Replit クラウド上で動作します。
コード実行ツール利用ブラウザ操作メモリDemo · hover to playGitHubの自然言語マイクロアプリビルダー — 個人用アプリを説明するだけで、デプロイ済みの動作バージョンを取得できます。
コード実行ツール利用メモリ
Demo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Magic.dev · alternatives to OpenHands
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison