Software engineer IA autonome qui livre des PR end-to-end.
Exécution de codeTool UseBrowser UseMemory
Demo · hover to play
Magic.dev vs Sweepwhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
Autonomous AI engineer trained on long contexts — handles hour-long coding sessions without losing track.
CodeTool useMemory
Magic.dev vs Sweep — specs
| Spec | Magic.dev | Sweep |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 68 / 100 (B) | 60 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Freemium · from $30 |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 2 apps | 1 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | May 2025 | Mar 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Magic.dev
Agent Rank
68/ 100
- Autonomie
- 9
- Capacités
- 6
- Intégrations
- 2
- Tarification
- 9
- Maturité
- 5
- Vérifiabilité
- 10
Calculé automatiquement à partir de l'autonomie, des capacités, des intégrations, de la tarification, de la maturité et de la vérification éditoriale. Mis à jour à chaque déploiement. Comment est-ce calculé ?
Sweep
Agent Rank
60/ 100
- Autonomie
- 9
- Capacités
- 6
- Intégrations
- 2
- Tarification
- 7
- Maturité
- 6
- Vérifiabilité
- 6
Calculé automatiquement à partir de l'autonomie, des capacités, des intégrations, de la tarification, de la maturité et de la vérification éditoriale. Mis à jour à chaque déploiement. Comment est-ce calculé ?
Pros & cons
Magic.dev
Pour
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
Contre
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
Sweep
Pour
- +Issue-to-PR turnaround in minutes for well-described bugs
- +GitHub-native — authenticates as a GitHub App, no extension needed
- +Great on TypeScript / Python / Go codebases with reasonable test coverage
Contre
- −Struggles when issues are vague or codebase is messy
- −No interactive mode — you describe, it ships
- −Less effective on closed languages or proprietary frameworks
Pricing
Magic.dev
Enterprise
Sur mesure
Engineering teams
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
Sweep
Free
Gratuit
Personal repos
- +Up to 5 issue-to-PR runs/month
- +Public repos only
Recommandé
Starter
$30/mois
Small teams
- +Unlimited runs
- +Private repos
- +Configurable rules
Enterprise
Sur mesure
Larger orgs
- +Self-hosted option
- +SAML SSO
- +Dedicated support
Which one should you pick?
Magic.dev
Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Magic.dev →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Magic.dev or Sweep in 2026?+
Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Sweep if auditability or self-hosting matters. Most working teams running both can use Magic.dev for primary work and Sweep for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Magic.dev and Sweep?+
Magic.dev starts at Subscription · Free tier; Sweep starts at Freemium · from $30. Magic.dev is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Magic.dev or Sweep?+
Both Magic.dev and Sweep are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Magic.dev and Sweep also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
Créez et déployez des applications complètes depuis un seul prompt — fonctionne dans le cloud Replit.
Exécution de codeTool UseBrowser UseMemoryDemo · hover to playConstructeur de micro-applications en langage naturel de GitHub — décrivez une application personnelle, obtenez une version fonctionnelle déployée.
Exécution de codeTool UseMemory
See more alternatives: alternatives to Magic.dev · alternatives to Sweep
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison