リファクタリング、監査、移行のための OpenAI のオープンソースターミナルエージェントです。
コード実行ツール利用
Demo · hover to play
Aider vs Continuewhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
OSS terminal coding assistant — pair-programs, edits in place, commits as you go.
CodeTool use
Aider vs Continue — specs
| Spec | Aider | Continue |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 70 / 100 (B) | 77 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Free · OSS | Free · OSS |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 2 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Jan 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Aider
Agent Rank
70/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 4
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 10
- 完成度
- 6
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Continue
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 10
- 完成度
- 8
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Aider
メリット
- +Best-in-class pair-programming flow in the terminal
- +Repo map mode handles surprisingly large codebases
- +Provider-agnostic — bring any LLM that supports tool use
デメリット
- −No UI — pure CLI is a deal-breaker for some teams
- −Token spend at heavy use rivals a paid SaaS plan
- −Less polished autonomy than Devin or Replit Agent
Continue
メリット
- +Apache 2.0 — fully open source; auditable end-to-end
- +Works with any OpenAI-compatible API endpoint, including local LLMs
- +JetBrains support that Cursor and Cline lack
デメリット
- −Smaller community than Cursor or Cline
- −Less polished than Cursor; requires more configuration
- −No native MCP server marketplace — manual config required
Pricing
Aider
Open source
無料
Everyone
- +Apache-2.0 license
- +BYO model key (any provider)
- +Voice mode, repo map, auto-commit
Continue
Open source
無料
Engineers + teams
- +Apache 2.0 license
- +BYO model API key
- +VS Code + JetBrains support
おすすめ
Hub
$20/月
Teams sharing config
- +Shared models + assistants
- +Org-wide rules and prompts
- +Usage analytics
Which one should you pick?
Continue
Pick Continue if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need.
Try Continue →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Aider or Continue in 2026?+
Pick Aider if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Pick Continue if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Aider for primary work and Continue for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Aider and Continue?+
Both Aider and Continue start in the same pricing range (Free · OSS vs Free · OSS). Total cost of ownership depends on your team size and volume — see the TCO calculator for your specific math.
Which is more autonomous, Aider or Continue?+
Both Aider and Continue are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Aider and Continue also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
IDE 内で動作するオープンソースの自律的なコーディングエージェントです。
コード実行ツール利用ブラウザ操作Demo · hover to playAnthropic のターミナルエージェント — コンポーザブルでスクリプト対応、Claude の Tool Use ループを中核に構築されています。
コード実行ツール利用メモリDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Aider · alternatives to Continue
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison