エンタープライズ向けコードインテリジェンスエージェント — コードに関する質問に回答し、大規模モノレポをナビゲート。
コード実行ツール利用RAGメモリ
Demo · hover to play
Augment Code vs Continuewhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
Autonomous coding agent grounded in your whole codebase — multi-file edits with deep context.
CodeTool useMemoryRAG
Augment Code vs Continue — specs
| Spec | Augment Code | Continue |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 75 / 100 (A) | 77 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $30 | Free · OSS |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory, RAG | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2024 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Augment Code
Agent Rank
75/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 7
- 完成度
- 8
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Continue
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 10
- 完成度
- 8
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Augment Code
メリット
- +Best-in-class context engine (200K tokens) — handles monoliths competitors choke on
- +Native AGENTS.md spec-driven workflow with multi-agent "Intent" orchestration
- +70.6% on SWE-Bench Verified — top of the public coding-agent leaderboard
デメリット
- −Enterprise focus = pricier than Cursor for solo devs
- −Less hands-off than fully-autonomous Devin/Factory Droid
- −Web/UI changes ship slower than IDE-first competitors
Continue
メリット
- +Apache 2.0 — fully open source; auditable end-to-end
- +Works with any OpenAI-compatible API endpoint, including local LLMs
- +JetBrains support that Cursor and Cline lack
デメリット
- −Smaller community than Cursor or Cline
- −Less polished than Cursor; requires more configuration
- −No native MCP server marketplace — manual config required
Pricing
Augment Code
Free
無料
Individuals
- +25 messages/month
- +VS Code + JetBrains
- +Public repos only
おすすめ
Pro
$30/月
Developers
- +Unlimited messages
- +200K Context Engine
- +Private repos
Enterprise
カスタム
Engineering teams
- +SSO + audit logs
- +Custom retention
- +Dedicated CS
Continue
Open source
無料
Engineers + teams
- +Apache 2.0 license
- +BYO model API key
- +VS Code + JetBrains support
おすすめ
Hub
$20/月
Teams sharing config
- +Shared models + assistants
- +Org-wide rules and prompts
- +Usage analytics
Which one should you pick?
Augment Code
Pick Augment Code if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need.
Try Augment Code →Continue
Pick Continue if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try Continue →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Augment Code or Continue in 2026?+
Pick Augment Code if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Pick Continue if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Most working teams running both can use Augment Code for primary work and Continue for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Augment Code and Continue?+
Augment Code starts at Freemium · from $30; Continue starts at Free · OSS. Continue is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Augment Code or Continue?+
Both Augment Code and Continue are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Augment Code and Continue also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
AWS のエンタープライズ向け AIエージェント — コーディングアシスタント、ビジネスチャット、AWS データに基づくカスタマイズ可能な Q アプリ。
コード実行ツール利用RAGメモリDemo · hover to playGitHub のAIペアプログラマー — インライン補完、チャット、そしてPRを自動作成する新しいAgent モードを搭載。
コード実行ツール利用メモリDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Augment Code · alternatives to Continue
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison