エンタープライズ向けコードインテリジェンスエージェント — コードに関する質問に回答し、大規模モノレポをナビゲート。
コード実行ツール利用RAGメモリ
Demo · hover to play
Augment Code vs Dustwhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
Autonomous coding agent grounded in your whole codebase — multi-file edits with deep context.
CodeTool useMemoryRAG
Augment Code vs Dust — specs
| Spec | Augment Code | Dust |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 75 / 100 (A) | 77 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $30 | Subscription · from $29 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory, RAG | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Apr 2024 | Mar 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Augment Code
Agent Rank
75/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 7
- 完成度
- 8
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Dust
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 10
- 料金
- 7
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Augment Code
メリット
- +Best-in-class context engine (200K tokens) — handles monoliths competitors choke on
- +Native AGENTS.md spec-driven workflow with multi-agent "Intent" orchestration
- +70.6% on SWE-Bench Verified — top of the public coding-agent leaderboard
デメリット
- −Enterprise focus = pricier than Cursor for solo devs
- −Less hands-off than fully-autonomous Devin/Factory Droid
- −Web/UI changes ship slower than IDE-first competitors
Dust
メリット
- +"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed workspaces designed for company-wide use
- +$40M Series B (Sequoia, Snowflake, Datadog) signals strong enterprise validation
- +Deepest connector library among agent platforms (Slack/Notion/GitHub/Salesforce/GDrive)
デメリット
- −French roots — strongest support in EU/UK time zones
- −Higher per-seat pricing than Glean for read-only retrieval use cases
- −Custom agent authoring requires technical user (less low-code than Gumloop)
Pricing
Augment Code
Free
無料
Individuals
- +25 messages/month
- +VS Code + JetBrains
- +Public repos only
おすすめ
Pro
$30/月
Developers
- +Unlimited messages
- +200K Context Engine
- +Private repos
Enterprise
カスタム
Engineering teams
- +SSO + audit logs
- +Custom retention
- +Dedicated CS
Dust
Free
無料
Individuals
- +1 workspace
- +3 agents
- +GPT-4o + Claude 3.5
おすすめ
Pro
$29/席/月
Teams
- +Unlimited agents
- +All integrations
- +Custom data sources
Enterprise
カスタム
Large orgs
- +SSO + audit
- +Custom retention
- +Dedicated tenants
Which one should you pick?
Augment Code
Pick Augment Code if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Augment Code →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Augment Code or Dust in 2026?+
Pick Augment Code if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Dust if cost is the main constraint. Most working teams running both can use Augment Code for primary work and Dust for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Augment Code and Dust?+
Augment Code starts at Freemium · from $30; Dust starts at Subscription · from $29. Dust is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Augment Code or Dust?+
Both Augment Code and Dust are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Augment Code and Dust also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
AWS のエンタープライズ向け AIエージェント — コーディングアシスタント、ビジネスチャット、AWS データに基づくカスタマイズ可能な Q アプリ。
コード実行ツール利用RAGメモリDemo · hover to playGitHub のAIペアプログラマー — インライン補完、チャット、そしてPRを自動作成する新しいAgent モードを搭載。
コード実行ツール利用メモリDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Augment Code · alternatives to Dust
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison