AWS のエンタープライズ向け AIエージェント — コーディングアシスタント、ビジネスチャット、AWS データに基づくカスタマイズ可能な Q アプリ。
Continue vs GitHub Copilotwhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
Open-source coding agent for VS Code and JetBrains — bring your own model, customize every prompt.
GitHub's AI pair-programmer — inline completions, chat, and the new Agent mode that ships PRs.
Continue vs GitHub Copilot — specs
| Spec | Continue | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 80 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Free · OSS | Subscription · from $10 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 10
- 完成度
- 8
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 8
- 完成度
- 10
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
- +Apache 2.0 — fully open source; auditable end-to-end
- +Works with any OpenAI-compatible API endpoint, including local LLMs
- +JetBrains support that Cursor and Cline lack
- −Smaller community than Cursor or Cline
- −Less polished than Cursor; requires more configuration
- −No native MCP server marketplace — manual config required
- +Biggest install base of any coding agent — every IDE, every language
- +Now ships an Agent mode that competes credibly with Cursor and Cline
- +IP indemnity tier is unique — meaningful for enterprise legal teams
- −Agent mode is newer than Cursor + Cline — fewer power-user features
- −Multi-file editing is more cautious than Cursor by default
- −GitHub-centric integrations — weaker outside the GitHub ecosystem
Pricing
- +Apache 2.0 license
- +BYO model API key
- +VS Code + JetBrains support
- +Shared models + assistants
- +Org-wide rules and prompts
- +Usage analytics
- +2,000 completions/mo
- +Chat with limits
- +GPT-5 mini
- +Unlimited completions
- +Agent mode
- +All models including Claude + GPT-5
- +Higher rate limits
- +Premium model quotas
- +Spark included
- +Admin controls
- +Audit logs
- +IP indemnity
- +Fine-tuned models
- +Knowledge-base integration
- +SSO
Which one should you pick?
Pick Continue if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try Continue →Pick GitHub Copilot if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need.
Try GitHub Copilot →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Continue or GitHub Copilot in 2026?+
Pick Continue if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Pick GitHub Copilot if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Continue for primary work and GitHub Copilot for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Continue and GitHub Copilot?+
Continue starts at Free · OSS; GitHub Copilot starts at Subscription · from $10. Continue is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Continue or GitHub Copilot?+
Both Continue and GitHub Copilot are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Continue and GitHub Copilot also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- コード実行ツール利用RAGメモリDemo · hover to play
コードベース全体を把握した上で動作する自律的なコーディングエージェント — 深いコンテキストを活用したマルチファイル編集。
コード実行ツール利用メモリRAG
Demo · hover to playエンタープライズ向けコードインテリジェンスエージェント — コードに関する質問に回答し、大規模モノレポをナビゲート。
コード実行ツール利用RAGメモリDemo · hover to play