Forrester Wave Leader 2026 — enterprise voice and chat agent platform (now NiCE Cognigy).
ツール利用音声メモリRAG
Demo · hover to playCresta vs Torqwhich AI support agent should you pick in 2026?
Conversational AI agent assist for contact centers — coaches reps and automates after-call work in real time.
VoiceTool useMemoryRAG
Cresta vs Torq — specs
| Spec | Cresta | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 80 / 100 (A) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Voice, Tool use, Memory, RAG | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Cresta
Agent Rank
80/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 8
- 料金
- 9
- 完成度
- 5
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Torq
Agent Rank
67/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 4
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Cresta
メリット
- +Best-in-class real-time coaching — recommendations during the call
- +Auto-summarizes calls + drafts after-call work, saving reps 5+ min per call
- +Strong deployments at Fortune 500 contact centers
デメリット
- −Enterprise-only — minimum seat counts in the hundreds
- −Implementation requires conversation-data training (4–8 weeks)
- −Augments humans rather than replacing them — different positioning than fully autonomous tier
Torq
メリット
- +$1.2B valuation Series D Jan 2026; Forbes "de facto leader" in agentic SOC
- +Hyperautomation roots + agent layer = best of both worlds
- +100+ security tool integrations; widest of any agentic SOC platform
デメリット
- −Enterprise focus — SMB SOCs find pricing prohibitive
- −Steeper learning curve than newer agent-native competitors
- −Best ROI requires existing SIEM/EDR/SOAR stack to orchestrate
Pricing
Cresta
Enterprise
カスタム
Contact centers 200+ reps
- +Real-time agent assist
- +Conversation intelligence
- +After-call work automation
Torq
Pro
カスタム
Mid-market SOC
- +Agentic workflows
- +100+ integrations
- +Standard SLA
おすすめ
Enterprise
カスタム
Large SOC
- +Unlimited agents
- +Custom playbooks
- +Strategic CS
Sovereign
カスタム
Regulated
- +Air-gapped deployment
- +EU/US data residency
- +Dedicated engineering
Which one should you pick?
Cresta
Pick Cresta if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Cresta →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Cresta or Torq in 2026?+
Pick Cresta if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Torq if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Cresta for primary work and Torq for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Cresta and Torq?+
Cresta starts at Subscription · Free tier; Torq starts at Subscription. Cresta is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Cresta or Torq?+
Torq is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Cresta and Torq also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- Demo · hover to play
コールセンター向けエンタープライズ音声アシスタント — 自然な会話で顧客対応を完結。
音声ツール利用メモリRAGDemo · hover to playAIカスタマーサービスエージェント — チャット・メール・音声を横断してチケットを解決し、測定可能な自動解決率を実現します。
RAGツール利用メモリ音声Demo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Cresta · alternatives to Torq
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison