Enterprise "Agent OS" with trust, memory, and multi-agent coordination — built by ex-Atlassian CTO.

"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed company-wide agents across your stack.
| Spec | Dust | Tines AI |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $29 | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent | Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 5 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Apr 2025 |
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pick Tines AI if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Tines AI →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Pick Dust if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Pick Tines AI if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Dust for primary work and Tines AI for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
Dust starts at Subscription · from $29; Tines AI starts at Subscription · Free tier. Tines AI is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Both Dust and Tines AI are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
Enterprise "Agent OS" with trust, memory, and multi-agent coordination — built by ex-Atlassian CTO.

GDPR-native multi-model AI workspace with built-in agent builder — Europe's Glean alternative.

AIエージェント搭載のビジュアルWorkflow自動化 — 2,000以上のアプリをまたぐドラッグ&ドロップシナリオ。