アップロードされたソース（PDF、メモ、音声）に基づいて回答するGoogle のAIリサーチアシスタント。
RAGメモリ音声
Demo · hover to play
Elicit vs Gensparkwhich AI research agent should you pick in 2026?
Literature-review agent for academics — extracts and synthesizes from 200M+ papers.
RAGMemory
Elicit vs Genspark — specs
| Spec | Elicit | Genspark |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 65 / 100 (B) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Assistant | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $12 | Freemium · from $25 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | RAG, Memory | Browser, Tool use, Voice, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 2 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Jul 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Elicit
Agent Rank
65/ 100
- 自律性
- 7
- 機能
- 4
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 8
- 完成度
- 6
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Genspark
Agent Rank
67/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 10
- 連携
- 2
- 料金
- 7
- 完成度
- 6
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Elicit
メリット
- +Only agent that indexes 200M+ academic papers with reliable extraction
- +Literature-review quality output with rigorous citations
- +Zotero export keeps your existing reference workflow
デメリット
- −UI built for academic researchers; learning curve for solo operators
- −Limited use outside academic literature — bad fit for market research
- −Custom extraction templates are Pro-only
Genspark
メリット
- +$385M Series B Apr 2026 — among the highest-funded multi-agent platforms
- +Unique built-in AI phone module — agent can make real-world calls
- +Generates slides + sheets + research reports in a single prompt
デメリット
- −Hot-button branding — China-founded but US-based; geopolitical scrutiny possible
- −AI phone occasionally fails on heavily-accented English
- −Higher consumer pricing than Perplexity / You.com
Pricing
Elicit
Basic
無料
Light use
- +100 paper queries/month
- +Standard extraction
おすすめ
Plus
$12/月
Researchers
- +Unlimited paper queries
- +Full extraction columns
- +Zotero export
Pro
$49/月
Power users
- +Higher rate limits
- +Custom extraction templates
- +PDF chat
Genspark
Free
無料
Individuals
- +Super Agent
- +Limited AI phone calls
- +Standard speed
おすすめ
Plus
$25/月
Power users
- +Unlimited Super Agent
- +AI phone module
- +Priority compute
Pro
$200/月
Teams
- +Multiple agents in parallel
- +Shared workspaces
- +API access
Which one should you pick?
Elicit
Pick Elicit if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Elicit →Genspark
Pick Genspark if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Genspark →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Elicit or Genspark in 2026?+
Pick Elicit if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Genspark if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Elicit for primary work and Genspark for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Elicit and Genspark?+
Elicit starts at Freemium · from $12; Genspark starts at Freemium · from $25. Elicit is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Elicit or Genspark?+
Genspark is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Assistant). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Elicit and Genspark also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
科学研究向けAI検索エンジン — 2億件以上の査読済み論文から回答を抽出します。
RAGメモリDemo · hover to play開発者向けAI検索エンジン — コード優先の結果と引用元で技術的な質問に回答します。
ブラウザ操作RAGメモリDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Elicit · alternatives to Genspark
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison