エンドツーエンドでPRを完結させる、自律的なAIソフトウェアエンジニアです。
コード実行ツール利用ブラウザ操作メモリ
Demo · hover to play
Factory AI vs Magic.devwhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
Autonomous "Droid" agent for end-to-end engineering with native AGENTS.md support.
CodeTool useMemoryMulti-agent
Factory AI vs Magic.dev — specs
| Spec | Factory AI | Magic.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 75 / 100 (A) | 68 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $40 | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 2 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Oct 2025 | May 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Factory AI
Agent Rank
75/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 8
- 料金
- 7
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Magic.dev
Agent Rank
68/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 2
- 料金
- 9
- 完成度
- 5
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Factory AI
メリット
- +True end-to-end autonomy — Droid agent ships complete features without hand-holding
- +Native AGENTS.md adopter — fits modern repo conventions out of the box
- +Multi-agent coordination across linked repos for cross-service changes
デメリット
- −Token-based pricing can spike on large refactors
- −Zed-first; JetBrains support newer, VS Code on roadmap
- −Less mature than Devin for very long-running autonomous sessions
Magic.dev
メリット
- +Unique long-context model — can hold an entire mid-sized repo in one session
- +Strong on cross-cutting refactors that other agents struggle with
- +Funded at frontier-lab levels — engineering muscle behind the product
デメリット
- −Enterprise pricing — no public per-seat tier
- −Newer entrant — fewer customer references than Devin or Cursor
- −Best for very large codebases; overkill for solo + small-team work
Pricing
Factory AI
Standard
$40/月
Individuals
- +Droid autonomous agent
- +Zed + JetBrains
- +5M Standard Tokens/mo
おすすめ
Pro
$200/月
Engineering teams
- +Unlimited Droids
- +50M tokens/mo
- +Multi-agent coordination
Enterprise
カスタム
Large orgs
- +Custom token volume
- +SSO + audit
- +Dedicated support
Magic.dev
Enterprise
カスタム
Engineering teams
- +Long-context model (100M+ tokens)
- +Codebase-wide reasoning
- +Custom deployment
Which one should you pick?
Factory AI
Pick Factory AI if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need.
Try Factory AI →Magic.dev
Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Magic.dev →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Factory AI or Magic.dev in 2026?+
Pick Factory AI if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Pick Magic.dev if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Factory AI for primary work and Magic.dev for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Factory AI and Magic.dev?+
Factory AI starts at Subscription · from $40; Magic.dev starts at Subscription · Free tier. Magic.dev is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Factory AI or Magic.dev?+
Both Factory AI and Magic.dev are Autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Factory AI and Magic.dev also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
単一のプロンプトから完全なアプリケーションをビルドしてリリース — Replit クラウド上で動作します。
コード実行ツール利用ブラウザ操作メモリDemo · hover to playGitHubの自然言語マイクロアプリビルダー — 個人用アプリを説明するだけで、デプロイ済みの動作バージョンを取得できます。
コード実行ツール利用メモリ
Demo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Factory AI · alternatives to Magic.dev
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison