エンドツーエンドでPRを完結させる、自律的なAIソフトウェアエンジニアです。
Factory AI vs Sourcegraph Codywhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
Autonomous "Droid" agent for end-to-end engineering with native AGENTS.md support.
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
Factory AI vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Factory AI | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 75 / 100 (A) | 77 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $40 | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Oct 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 8
- 料金
- 7
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 8
- 完成度
- 8
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
- +True end-to-end autonomy — Droid agent ships complete features without hand-holding
- +Native AGENTS.md adopter — fits modern repo conventions out of the box
- +Multi-agent coordination across linked repos for cross-service changes
- −Token-based pricing can spike on large refactors
- −Zed-first; JetBrains support newer, VS Code on roadmap
- −Less mature than Devin for very long-running autonomous sessions
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
- +Droid autonomous agent
- +Zed + JetBrains
- +5M Standard Tokens/mo
- +Unlimited Droids
- +50M tokens/mo
- +Multi-agent coordination
- +Custom token volume
- +SSO + audit
- +Dedicated support
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Pick Factory AI if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Factory AI →Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Sourcegraph Cody →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Factory AI or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Factory AI if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use Factory AI for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Factory AI and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Factory AI starts at Subscription · from $40; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Factory AI or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Factory AI is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Factory AI and Sourcegraph Cody also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- コード実行ツール利用ブラウザ操作メモリDemo · hover to play
単一のプロンプトから完全なアプリケーションをビルドしてリリース — Replit クラウド上で動作します。
コード実行ツール利用ブラウザ操作メモリDemo · hover to playGitHubの自然言語マイクロアプリビルダー — 個人用アプリを説明するだけで、デプロイ済みの動作バージョンを取得できます。
コード実行ツール利用メモリ
Demo · hover to play