ファーストクラスのAIエージェントノードを備えたオープンソースの workflow 自動化 — セルフホストまたはクラウドで利用可能。
ツール利用メモリマルチエージェント
Demo · hover to play
Fixie vs Torqwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Build durable agents that act on your internal data — open framework.
Tool useRAGMemoryMulti-agent
Fixie vs Torq — specs
| Spec | Fixie | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 73 / 100 (A) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Free · OSS | Subscription |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, RAG, Memory, Multi-agent | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | — | — |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Fixie
Agent Rank
73/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 10
- 完成度
- 6
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Torq
Agent Rank
67/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 4
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Fixie
メリット
- +Real multi-agent primitives — planner + workers + reviewer out of the box
- +Strong for internal-tool agents over your own data
- +Permissive license; auditable end-to-end
デメリット
- −Framework, not a finished product — engineering effort to ship anything
- −Smaller community than LangChain / LlamaIndex
- −Cloud pricing not yet published — usage-based and opaque
Torq
メリット
- +$1.2B valuation Series D Jan 2026; Forbes "de facto leader" in agentic SOC
- +Hyperautomation roots + agent layer = best of both worlds
- +100+ security tool integrations; widest of any agentic SOC platform
デメリット
- −Enterprise focus — SMB SOCs find pricing prohibitive
- −Steeper learning curve than newer agent-native competitors
- −Best ROI requires existing SIEM/EDR/SOAR stack to orchestrate
Pricing
Fixie
Open source
無料
Builders
- +Apache-2.0 framework
- +Self-host
- +Bring your own models + data
Cloud
カスタム
Teams
- +Hosted runtime
- +Multi-agent orchestration
- +Observability
Torq
Pro
カスタム
Mid-market SOC
- +Agentic workflows
- +100+ integrations
- +Standard SLA
おすすめ
Enterprise
カスタム
Large SOC
- +Unlimited agents
- +Custom playbooks
- +Strategic CS
Sovereign
カスタム
Regulated
- +Air-gapped deployment
- +EU/US data residency
- +Dedicated engineering
Which one should you pick?
Fixie
Pick Fixie if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try Fixie →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Fixie or Torq in 2026?+
Pick Fixie if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Pick Torq if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Fixie for primary work and Torq for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Fixie and Torq?+
Fixie starts at Free · OSS; Torq starts at Subscription. Fixie is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Fixie or Torq?+
Torq is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Fixie and Torq also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
"Multiplayer AI" — shared, governed company-wide agents across your stack.
ツール利用メモリRAGマルチエージェント
Demo · hover to playEnterprise "Agent OS" with trust, memory, and multi-agent coordination — built by ex-Atlassian CTO.
ツール利用メモリRAGマルチエージェント
See more alternatives: alternatives to Fixie · alternatives to Torq
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison