7,000以上のアプリ連携にAIエージェント層を追加 — 既存の自動化 stack に計画立案機能を加えます。
ツール利用メモリ
Demo · hover to play
Lindy vs Paradoxwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
Build no-code AI employees for inbox, meetings and CRM updates.
Tool useMemoryVoice
Lindy vs Paradox — specs
| Spec | Lindy | Paradox |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $49 | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, Voice | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Voice |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Mar 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Lindy
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 8
- 料金
- 7
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Paradox
Agent Rank
75/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 9
- 完成度
- 5
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Lindy
メリット
- +No-code agent builder is genuinely usable by non-engineers
- +Strong on inbox + meeting + CRM-hygiene patterns
- +AIAGENTS coupon stacks with annual; effective ~$44/mo
デメリット
- −Microsoft 365 integrations weaker than Google Workspace
- −Credit math obscures real cost at heavy usage
- −Voice features (Pro) need careful tuning
Paradox
メリット
- +Best-fit AI worker for high-volume hourly hiring (retail, hospitality, healthcare)
- +Olivia handles SMS + chat conversations natively — meets candidates where they are
- +Genuine 40–60% reduction in time-to-hire at deployed customers
デメリット
- −Less differentiated for low-volume executive hiring
- −Enterprise sales motion — no self-serve option
- −Requires ATS integration setup (Workday, Greenhouse, etc.)
Pricing
Lindy
Free
無料
Trial
- +400 credits/mo
- +1 active workflow
おすすめ
Starter
$49/月
Individuals
- +5,000 credits/mo
- +Unlimited workflows
- +All integrations
Pro
$199/月
Power users / small teams
- +30,000 credits/mo
- +Phone calls
- +Team seats
Paradox
Enterprise
カスタム
Mid-market and enterprise hiring orgs
- +Olivia conversational agent
- +High-volume hiring workflows
- +ATS integrations
- +SMS + chat + email
Which one should you pick?
Paradox
Pick Paradox if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Paradox →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Lindy or Paradox in 2026?+
Pick Lindy if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Pick Paradox if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Lindy for primary work and Paradox for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Lindy and Paradox?+
Lindy starts at Subscription · from $49; Paradox starts at Subscription · Free tier. Paradox is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Lindy or Paradox?+
Paradox is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Lindy and Paradox also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
AIエージェント搭載のビジュアルWorkflow自動化 — 2,000以上のアプリをまたぐドラッグ＆ドロップシナリオ。
ツール利用メモリマルチエージェントDemo · hover to playVisual no-code platform for building always-on agent workflows.
ツール利用メモリマルチエージェントブラウザ操作
Demo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Lindy · alternatives to Paradox
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison