Visual no-code platform for building always-on agent workflows.
ツール利用メモリマルチエージェントブラウザ操作
Demo · hover to playMagical vs Make.com Agentswhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
AI assistant that automates repetitive typing — paste templates and autofill across any web app.
BrowserTool use
Visual workflow automation with AI agents — drag-and-drop scenarios across 2,000+ apps.
Tool useMemoryMulti-agent
Magical vs Make.com Agents — specs
| Spec | Magical | Make.com Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 68 / 100 (B) | 85 / 100 (S) |
| Autonomy | Assistant | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $6 | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Browser, Tool use | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 8 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Apr 2024 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Magical
Agent Rank
68/ 100
- 自律性
- 7
- 機能
- 4
- 連携
- 8
- 料金
- 8
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 7
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Make.com Agents
Agent Rank
85/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 10
- 料金
- 8
- 完成度
- 9
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Magical
Make.com Agents
メリット
- +Visual scenario builder is the most accessible automation tool besides Zapier
- +Cheapest AI-agent automation tier on the market ($9)
- +Strong on multi-step branching scenarios where Zapier feels limiting
デメリット
- −Operations math is opaque at first — every step costs ops
- −Smaller AI feature set than Lindy / Relay built-from-scratch agent platforms
- −European data residency only on paid tiers
Pricing
Magical
Make.com Agents
Free
無料
Trial
- +1,000 operations/mo
- +No agent features
- +2 active scenarios
おすすめ
Core
$9/月
Solo / small teams
- +10,000 ops/mo
- +AI agent nodes
- +Webhooks + schedules
Pro
$16/月
Heavy users
- +10,000 ops base + add-ons
- +Priority queue
- +Custom variables
Teams
$29/席/月
Teams
- +Shared scenarios
- +Roles + admin
- +Higher ops base
Which one should you pick?
Make.com Agents
Pick Make.com Agents if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint.
Try Make.com Agents →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Magical or Make.com Agents in 2026?+
Pick Magical if cost is the main constraint. Pick Make.com Agents if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place or if your stack spans many tools and integration depth is the constraint. Most working teams running both can use Magical for primary work and Make.com Agents for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Magical and Make.com Agents?+
Magical starts at Freemium · from $6; Make.com Agents starts at Freemium · from $9. Magical is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Magical or Make.com Agents?+
Make.com Agents is the more autonomous of the two (Semi-autonomous vs Assistant). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Magical and Make.com Agents also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- Demo · hover to play
Sheets、CRM、Notionをまたいで繰り返しWebタスクを自動化するブラウザWorkflowエージェント。
ブラウザ操作ツール利用Demo · hover to playあなたに代わってウェブを閲覧するパーソナルAIエージェント — フライトの予約、フォームの入力、タスクの自律的な完了が可能です。
ブラウザ操作ツール利用ビジョンメモリDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Magical · alternatives to Make.com Agents
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison