スタートアップ向けの AI 搭載記帳・CFO サービス — 人間のレビュワーによる自律的な月次決算。
ツール利用メモリRAG
Demo · hover to playNumeric vs Torqwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
AI controller — autonomous month-end close, reconciliations, flux analysis and variance commentary.
Tool useMemoryRAG
Numeric vs Torq — specs
| Spec | Numeric | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 68 / 100 (B) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · Free tier | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Numeric
Agent Rank
68/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 2
- 料金
- 9
- 完成度
- 6
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Torq
Agent Rank
67/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 4
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Numeric
メリット
- +Close-cycle time reduction of 30–50% at deployed customers
- +Variance commentary drafting saves the controller hours per close
- +Auditable trail of every AI-generated journal entry suggestion
デメリット
- −Best for teams already using NetSuite / Sage Intacct
- −Semi-auto only — humans must approve before posting
- −New product (2024 launch); customer reference list still building
Torq
メリット
- +$1.2B valuation Series D Jan 2026; Forbes "de facto leader" in agentic SOC
- +Hyperautomation roots + agent layer = best of both worlds
- +100+ security tool integrations; widest of any agentic SOC platform
デメリット
- −Enterprise focus — SMB SOCs find pricing prohibitive
- −Steeper learning curve than newer agent-native competitors
- −Best ROI requires existing SIEM/EDR/SOAR stack to orchestrate
Pricing
Numeric
Growth
カスタム
Mid-market finance teams
- +Close automation
- +Reconciliations
- +Flux analysis
おすすめ
Enterprise
カスタム
Large finance orgs
- +Everything in Growth
- +Multi-entity consolidation
- +Custom workflows
- +SSO
Torq
Pro
カスタム
Mid-market SOC
- +Agentic workflows
- +100+ integrations
- +Standard SLA
おすすめ
Enterprise
カスタム
Large SOC
- +Unlimited agents
- +Custom playbooks
- +Strategic CS
Sovereign
カスタム
Regulated
- +Air-gapped deployment
- +EU/US data residency
- +Dedicated engineering
Which one should you pick?
Numeric
Pick Numeric if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Numeric →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Numeric or Torq in 2026?+
Pick Numeric if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Torq if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Numeric for primary work and Torq for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Numeric and Torq?+
Numeric starts at Subscription · Free tier; Torq starts at Subscription. Numeric is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Numeric or Torq?+
Torq is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Numeric and Torq also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- Demo · hover to play
SMB 向け AI 記帳 — 取引の分類、銀行明細の照合、月次決算の生成を自動化。
ツール利用メモリRAGDemo · hover to playMicrosoft のAIワークアシスタント — Word、Excel、Outlook、Teams、Microsoft 365 Stack 全体にわたるエージェント。
ツール利用RAGメモリビジョンDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Numeric · alternatives to Torq
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison