エンドツーエンドでPRを完結させる、自律的なAIソフトウェアエンジニアです。
OpenHands vs Sourcegraph Codywhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
Open-source autonomous coding agent that plans, codes, and ships across full repos.
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
OpenHands vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | OpenHands | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 77 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Free · OSS | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Browser, Multi-agent | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | — | Verified |
| Released | Jun 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 10
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 8
- 完成度
- 8
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
- +73K+ GitHub stars — the most popular OSS coding agent (formerly OpenDevin)
- +Self-hostable with full data control — runs locally in Docker
- +Active community + plugin ecosystem; $18.8M Series A backs ongoing development
- −Setup more involved than commercial alternatives like Cursor
- −Hosted Cloud tier still maturing relative to Devin / Factory
- −BYO model API — costs separate from the platform itself
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
- +Full OSS code (MIT)
- +Docker sandbox
- +BYO model API
- +Hosted sandbox
- +GitHub integration
- +Claude / GPT included
- +Shared workspaces
- +Audit logs
- +Priority compute
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Pick OpenHands if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try OpenHands →Pick Sourcegraph Cody if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Sourcegraph Cody →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick OpenHands or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick OpenHands if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Most working teams running both can use OpenHands for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between OpenHands and Sourcegraph Cody?+
OpenHands starts at Free · OSS; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. OpenHands is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, OpenHands or Sourcegraph Cody?+
OpenHands is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing OpenHands and Sourcegraph Cody also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- コード実行ツール利用ブラウザ操作メモリDemo · hover to play
単一のプロンプトから完全なアプリケーションをビルドしてリリース — Replit クラウド上で動作します。
コード実行ツール利用ブラウザ操作メモリDemo · hover to playIDE 内で動作するオープンソースの自律的なコーディングエージェントです。
コード実行ツール利用ブラウザ操作Demo · hover to play