SMB 向け AI 記帳 — 取引の分類、銀行明細の照合、月次決算の生成を自動化。
ツール利用メモリRAG
Demo · hover to play
Pilot vs Torqwhich AI ops agent should you pick in 2026?
AI-powered bookkeeping and CFO services for startups — autonomous monthly close with human reviewers.
Tool useMemoryRAG
Pilot vs Torq — specs
| Spec | Pilot | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 60 / 100 (B) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $499 | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Pilot
Agent Rank
60/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 2
- 料金
- 4
- 完成度
- 6
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Torq
Agent Rank
67/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 4
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Pilot
メリット
- +AI-driven bookkeeping with human reviewers — best-of-both reliability
- +Tax + R&D credit + CFO services bundled at higher tiers
- +Used by 2,000+ venture-backed startups
デメリット
- −$499/mo entry is high for pre-seed founders
- −Mostly US-focused — limited international support
- −Less control if you want hands-on involvement in bookkeeping
Torq
メリット
- +$1.2B valuation Series D Jan 2026; Forbes "de facto leader" in agentic SOC
- +Hyperautomation roots + agent layer = best of both worlds
- +100+ security tool integrations; widest of any agentic SOC platform
デメリット
- −Enterprise focus — SMB SOCs find pricing prohibitive
- −Steeper learning curve than newer agent-native competitors
- −Best ROI requires existing SIEM/EDR/SOAR stack to orchestrate
Pricing
Pilot
Core
$499/月
Seed-stage startups
- +Monthly bookkeeping
- +P&L + balance sheet
- +Accrual basis
おすすめ
Plus
$849/月
Series A+
- +Custom reporting
- +Industry-specific
- +A/R + A/P management
Premium
カスタム
Scaling startups
- +Dedicated controller
- +CFO services
- +Audit support
Torq
Pro
カスタム
Mid-market SOC
- +Agentic workflows
- +100+ integrations
- +Standard SLA
おすすめ
Enterprise
カスタム
Large SOC
- +Unlimited agents
- +Custom playbooks
- +Strategic CS
Sovereign
カスタム
Regulated
- +Air-gapped deployment
- +EU/US data residency
- +Dedicated engineering
Which one should you pick?
Pilot
Pick Pilot if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Pilot →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Pilot or Torq in 2026?+
Pick Pilot if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Torq if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Pilot for primary work and Torq for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Pilot and Torq?+
Pilot starts at Subscription · from $499; Torq starts at Subscription. Pilot is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Pilot or Torq?+
Torq is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Pilot and Torq also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
AIコントローラー — 月次決算の自律化、照合、変動分析、差異コメンタリーを提供します。
ツール利用メモリRAG
Demo · hover to playMicrosoft のAIワークアシスタント — Word、Excel、Outlook、Teams、Microsoft 365 Stack 全体にわたるエージェント。
ツール利用RAGメモリビジョンDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Pilot · alternatives to Torq
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison