イシューをレビュー済みのプルリクエストに変換する GitHub ネイティブエージェントです。
コード実行ツール利用メモリ
Demo · hover to play
Pythagora vs Sourcegraph Codywhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
AI dev tool that builds entire production apps from spec — formerly GPT Pilot, open-source roots.
CodeTool useMemory
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
CodeTool useRAGMemory
Pythagora vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs
| Spec | Pythagora | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 67 / 100 (B) | 77 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $49 | Freemium · from $9 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, Memory | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory |
| Integrations | 2 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Mar 2024 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Pythagora
Agent Rank
67/ 100
- 自律性
- 9
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 7
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 7
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Sourcegraph Cody
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 8
- 完成度
- 8
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Pythagora
Sourcegraph Cody
メリット
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
デメリット
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Pricing
Pythagora
Sourcegraph Cody
Free
無料
Personal use
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
おすすめ
Pro
$9/月
Solo devs
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
Enterprise
$19/席/月
Engineering teams
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Which one should you pick?
Pythagora
Pick Pythagora if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try Pythagora →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Pythagora or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+
Pick Pythagora if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint. Most working teams running both can use Pythagora for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Pythagora and Sourcegraph Cody?+
Pythagora starts at Freemium · from $49; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Pythagora or Sourcegraph Cody?+
Pythagora is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Pythagora and Sourcegraph Cody also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
CodiumのAIエディタ — インライン補完とチャットに加え、Cascade エージェントフローを搭載。
コード実行ツール利用メモリブラウザ操作Demo · hover to playエンドツーエンドでPRを完結させる、自律的なAIソフトウェアエンジニアです。
コード実行ツール利用ブラウザ操作メモリDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Pythagora · alternatives to Sourcegraph Cody
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison