重要な情報を自動的にキャプチャし浮き上がらせる、自己組織化型 Memory AIエージェント。
Shortwave vs Sycamorewhich AI personal agent should you pick in 2026?
AI email client — natural-language search, summary, scheduled send, and AI-drafted replies grounded in your inbox.
Shortwave vs Sycamore — specs
| Spec | Shortwave | Sycamore |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 73 / 100 (A) | 67 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Assistant | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $9 | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | RAG, Memory, Tool use | Tool use, Memory, RAG, Multi-agent |
| Integrations | 3 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Mar 2026 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- 自律性
- 7
- 機能
- 6
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 8
- 完成度
- 7
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 8
- 料金
- 4
- 完成度
- 6
- 検証性
- 6
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
- +Best AI-native email client in 2026 — search, summarize, draft all natural-language
- +Built specifically for Gmail; faster + smarter than Gmail itself
- +Cheap relative to Superhuman with better AI features
- −Gmail-only — no Outlook support
- −AI assistant is helpful but not yet revolutionary
- −Smaller user base means fewer integrations than Gmail/Outlook ecosystems
- +$65M seed Mar 2026 (Coatue + Lightspeed) — one of the largest agent-platform seeds ever
- +Built by ex-Atlassian CTO — strong execution + enterprise distribution roots
- +Trust + memory layer designed for "production at scale" agents
- −Newest of the agent-OS platforms — limited public case studies
- −No public pricing — sales-led motion
- −Competing against Dust, Sema4.ai, Glean for the same enterprise budget
Pricing
- +Basic AI summary
- +90-day search
- +Unlimited search
- +AI assistant
- +Scheduled send
- +Shared inboxes
- +Send delegation
- +Admin controls
- +Agent OS core
- +Standard integrations
- +Standard SLA
- +Multi-agent coordination
- +Trust + memory layers
- +Strategic CS
- +On-prem deployment
- +Dedicated engineering
- +Custom integrations
Which one should you pick?
Pick Shortwave if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Shortwave →Pick Sycamore if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Sycamore →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Shortwave or Sycamore in 2026?+
Pick Shortwave if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Sycamore if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Shortwave for primary work and Sycamore for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Shortwave and Sycamore?+
Shortwave starts at Freemium · from $9; Sycamore starts at Subscription. Shortwave is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Shortwave or Sycamore?+
Sycamore is the more autonomous of the two (Semi-autonomous vs Assistant). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Shortwave and Sycamore also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- メモリRAGツール利用Demo · hover to play
Notion 内蔵の AIアシスタント — 文書の作成・要約・ワークスペース検索、および連携データ上でのエージェント実行。
RAGメモリツール利用Demo · hover to play通話を記録・要約してアクションへと変換するミーティングノートエージェント — ナレッジワーカーのパーソナルCoS。
メモリツール利用音声Demo · hover to play