コードベース全体を把握した上で動作する自律的なコーディングエージェント — 深いコンテキストを活用したマルチファイル編集。
コード実行ツール利用メモリRAG
Demo · hover to playSourcegraph Cody vs Wordwarewhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
CodeTool useRAGMemory
Sourcegraph Cody vs Wordware — specs
| Spec | Sourcegraph Cody | Wordware |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $9 | Freemium · from $29 |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory | Tool use, Memory, Multi-agent, RAG |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 4 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Apr 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Sourcegraph Cody
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 4
- 料金
- 8
- 完成度
- 8
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Wordware
Agent Rank
75/ 100
- 自律性
- 8
- 機能
- 8
- 連携
- 6
- 料金
- 7
- 完成度
- 6
- 検証性
- 10
自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?
Pros & cons
Sourcegraph Cody
メリット
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
デメリット
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Wordware
メリット
- +Document-like UI makes building agent workflows intuitive for non-engineers
- +Strong template library — copy a working workflow and modify
- +Genuinely useful for prototyping multi-step agent logic before coding it
デメリット
- −Production-grade deployments still benefit from custom code
- −Pricing tiers can be confusing as workflows scale
- −Less polished observability than purpose-built agent platforms
Pricing
Sourcegraph Cody
Free
無料
Personal use
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
おすすめ
Pro
$9/月
Solo devs
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
Enterprise
$19/席/月
Engineering teams
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Wordware
Free
無料
Trial
- +Public workflows only
- +Community templates
おすすめ
Pro
$29/月
Solo builders
- +Private workflows
- +Higher rate limits
- +Custom integrations
Team
$99/月
Small teams
- +Shared workspace
- +Role-based access
- +API export
Which one should you pick?
Wordware
Pick Wordware if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Wordware →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Sourcegraph Cody or Wordware in 2026?+
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint. Pick Wordware if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Sourcegraph Cody for primary work and Wordware for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Sourcegraph Cody and Wordware?+
Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9; Wordware starts at Freemium · from $29. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Sourcegraph Cody or Wordware?+
Both Sourcegraph Cody and Wordware are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.
Readers comparing Sourcegraph Cody and Wordware also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- Demo · hover to play
AWS のエンタープライズ向け AIエージェント — コーディングアシスタント、ビジネスチャット、AWS データに基づくカスタマイズ可能な Q アプリ。
コード実行ツール利用RAGメモリDemo · hover to playGitHub のAIペアプログラマー — インライン補完、チャット、そしてPRを自動作成する新しいAgent モードを搭載。
コード実行ツール利用メモリDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Sourcegraph Cody · alternatives to Wordware
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison