Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing
- 7
- Polish
- 8
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Capabilities
- Code
- Tool use
- Memory
- RAG
Integrations
- IDE
- VS CodeJetBrains
- Version control
- GitHub
Pricing tiers
- +25 messages/month
- +VS Code + JetBrains
- +Public repos only
- +Unlimited messages
- +200K Context Engine
- +Private repos
- +SSO + audit logs
- +Custom retention
- +Dedicated CS
Pros & cons
- +Best-in-class context engine (200K tokens) — handles monoliths competitors choke on
- +Native AGENTS.md spec-driven workflow with multi-agent "Intent" orchestration
- +70.6% on SWE-Bench Verified — top of the public coding-agent leaderboard
- −Enterprise focus = pricier than Cursor for solo devs
- −Less hands-off than fully-autonomous Devin/Factory Droid
- −Web/UI changes ship slower than IDE-first competitors
Autonomous coding agent grounded in your whole codebase — multi-file edits with deep context. Start with the freemium tier.
Frequently asked questions
What is Augment Code?+
Augment Code is an enterprise coding agent with a 200K-token Context Engine that handles large codebases competitors can't fit in context. Native AGENTS.md support, multi-agent "Intent" workflows, integrations across VS Code and JetBrains. From $30/mo.
Augment Code vs Cursor — which is better?+
Augment wins for enterprise-scale codebases (200K context, multi-agent Intent workflow); Cursor wins for solo devs needing speed and a polished IDE. Both are top-tier; pick by codebase size.
Does it work with private repos?+
Yes — Pro and Enterprise tiers index private repos with SOC 2 compliance and configurable retention. The Context Engine runs on dedicated infrastructure with no model-training on customer code.
User reviews
Write a review →Be the first to review. We verify every reviewer by email.
