11x vs Continue: 2026 comparison
AI digital workers for sales — Alice (SDR), Mike (SDR), and Jordan (CSM) handle full-cycle outbound.
11x vs Continue — specs
| Spec | 11x | Continue |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 75 / 100 (A) | 75 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Autonomous | Semi-autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $700 | Free · OSS |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Capabilities | Browser, Tool use, Memory, RAG | Code, Tool use, Memory |
| Integrations | 5 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | May 2025 | Feb 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 4
- Polish & maturity
- 8
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 10
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Genuine "AI employee" framing — agents have names, roles, and measurable output
- +Books real meetings autonomously at lower fully-loaded cost than a human SDR
- +Multi-channel sequences (email, LinkedIn) without separate tools
- −Meeting quality is lower-tier than top human SDRs for nuanced ICPs
- −$700/mo entry is real money for solo founders pre-revenue
- −Best on volume-driven outbound; weaker on highly targeted ABM
- +Apache 2.0 — fully open source; auditable end-to-end
- +Works with any OpenAI-compatible API endpoint, including local LLMs
- +JetBrains support that Cursor and Cline lack
- −Smaller community than Cursor or Cline
- −Less polished than Cursor; requires more configuration
- −No native MCP server marketplace — manual config required
Pricing
- +Alice (AI SDR)
- +~5,000 contacts/mo
- +Email + LinkedIn outbound
- +Slack alerts
- +Alice + Mike (AI SDR pair)
- +~15,000 contacts/mo
- +CRM sync (Salesforce, HubSpot)
- +Multi-channel sequences
- +Alice + Mike + Jordan (CSM)
- +Custom volumes
- +SSO + audit logs
- +Dedicated CS engineer
- +Apache 2.0 license
- +BYO model API key
- +VS Code + JetBrains support
- +Shared models + assistants
- +Org-wide rules and prompts
- +Usage analytics
Which one should you pick?
Pick Continue if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.
Try Continue →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick 11x or Continue in 2026?+
Pick 11x if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Pick Continue if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Most working teams running both can use 11x for primary work and Continue for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between 11x and Continue?+
11x starts at Subscription · from $700; Continue starts at Free · OSS. Continue is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, 11x or Continue?+
11x is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.