Apollo.io AI vs Decagon: 2026 comparison
Sales intelligence AI — 275M contact database plus AI sequences, dialer, and deal management.
Apollo.io AI vs Decagon — specs
| Spec | Apollo.io AI | Decagon |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 72 / 100 (A) | 72 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $59 | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Memory, RAG | Tool use, Memory, RAG |
| Integrations | 5 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Apr 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 6
- Polish & maturity
- 7
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Biggest contact database among self-serve sales platforms (275M+)
- +Bundles prospecting + dialer + sequences + CRM in one tool
- +AI features now genuinely useful — sequence generation and lead scoring
- −Data quality varies by region — strong US, weaker emerging markets
- −AI features less mature than dedicated tools (Regie, Lavender)
- −Self-serve pricing higher than competitors for full feature access
- +Chat-first agent with consistently 65–75% tier-1 deflection in production
- +Deep integration with existing helpdesks (Zendesk / Intercom / Salesforce)
- +Mid-market priced — easier conversation than Sierra
- −Voice support exists but is not the strength
- −Sales-led — no self-serve sign-up
- −Per-resolution pricing can sting if tickets spike unexpectedly
Pricing
- +60 credits/mo
- +Basic search
- +Email sequencing
- +900 credits/user/mo
- +Verified mobile numbers
- +Workflows + AI sequences
- +Dialer
- +Conversation intelligence
- +Advanced reports
- +Custom roles
- +API access
- +Per-resolution pricing
- +Zendesk / Intercom integration
- +Onboarding included
- +Custom integrations
- +SSO + audit log
- +Dedicated CSM
Which one should you pick?
Pick Apollo.io AI if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need.
Try Apollo.io AI →Pick Decagon if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Decagon →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Apollo.io AI or Decagon in 2026?+
Pick Apollo.io AI if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Memory) match what you need. Pick Decagon if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Apollo.io AI for primary work and Decagon for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Apollo.io AI and Decagon?+
Apollo.io AI starts at Freemium · from $59; Decagon starts at Subscription · Free tier. Decagon is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Apollo.io AI or Decagon?+
Decagon is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.