Clay vs Decagon: 2026 comparison
Composable agents for enrichment, scoring and outbound orchestration.
Clay vs Decagon — specs
| Spec | Clay | Decagon |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 68 / 100 (B) | 72 / 100 (A) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Subscription · from $149 | Subscription · Free tier |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Tool use, Browser, RAG | Tool use, Memory, RAG |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 3 apps |
| Verified | Verified | Verified |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Apr 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
- Autonomy fit
- 8
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing value
- 5
- Polish & maturity
- 6
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
- Autonomy fit
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing value
- 9
- Polish & maturity
- 5
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
- +Composable building blocks beat point tools — enrich + score + route in one
- +Strongest data-source coverage among GTM agents (50+ providers)
- +Highly programmable; sales ops loves the flexibility
- −Steep learning curve — not a one-day onboarding
- −Credit math gets opaque at scale
- −Less effective without a sales ops owner driving it
- +Chat-first agent with consistently 65–75% tier-1 deflection in production
- +Deep integration with existing helpdesks (Zendesk / Intercom / Salesforce)
- +Mid-market priced — easier conversation than Sierra
- −Voice support exists but is not the strength
- −Sales-led — no self-serve sign-up
- −Per-resolution pricing can sting if tickets spike unexpectedly
Pricing
- +Enrichment templates
- +5k credits/mo
- +CRM exports
- +25k credits/mo
- +Multi-source enrichment
- +Webhooks
- +Unlimited credits
- +Dedicated CS
- +SAML SSO
- +Per-resolution pricing
- +Zendesk / Intercom integration
- +Onboarding included
- +Custom integrations
- +SSO + audit log
- +Dedicated CSM
Which one should you pick?
Pick Decagon if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.
Try Decagon →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Clay or Decagon in 2026?+
Pick Clay if its specific capabilities (Tool use, Browser) match what you need. Pick Decagon if cost is the main constraint or if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Clay for primary work and Decagon for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Clay and Decagon?+
Clay starts at Subscription · from $149; Decagon starts at Subscription · Free tier. Decagon is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Clay or Decagon?+
Decagon is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.