Autonomous coding agent grounded in your whole codebase — multi-file edits with deep context.
CodeTool useMemoryRAG
Demo · hover to playSourcegraph Cody vs Tofuwhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?
Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.
CodeTool useRAGMemory
Autonomous campaign execution across email, ads, and web at brand-safe scale.
Tool useMemoryRAG
Sourcegraph Cody vs Tofu — specs
| Spec | Sourcegraph Cody | Tofu |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Rank | 77 / 100 (A) | 63 / 100 (B) |
| Autonomy | Semi-autonomous | Autonomous |
| Pricing | Freemium · from $9 | Subscription |
| Open source | No | No |
| Capabilities | Code, Tool use, RAG, Memory | Tool use, Memory, RAG |
| Integrations | 4 apps | 5 apps |
| Verified | Verified | — |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Jun 2025 |
Agent Rank breakdown
Sourcegraph Cody
Agent Rank
77/ 100
- Autonomy
- 8
- Capabilities
- 8
- Integrations
- 4
- Pricing
- 8
- Polish
- 8
- Verifiability
- 10
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Tofu
Agent Rank
63/ 100
- Autonomy
- 9
- Capabilities
- 6
- Integrations
- 6
- Pricing
- 4
- Polish
- 7
- Verifiability
- 6
Auto-computed from autonomy, capabilities, integrations, pricing, maturity and editorial verification. Updated every deploy. How is this computed?
Pros & cons
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros
- +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
- +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
- +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
Cons
- −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
- −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
- −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Tofu
Pros
- +#1 in multiple 2026 marketing-agent buyer guides — top of the vertical
- +Autonomous orchestration across email + ads + web (most agents only do one channel)
- +Strong brand-governance — runs every output through brand library checks
Cons
- −Enterprise pricing only — no SMB self-serve
- −Newer than Writer/Jasper — fewer Fortune 500 case studies
- −Best ROI requires existing martech stack (HubSpot/Marketo/Salesforce)
Pricing
Sourcegraph Cody
Free
Free
Personal use
- +Limited chat + completions
- +Public repos only
Recommended
Pro
$9/mo
Solo devs
- +Unlimited usage
- +Larger context
- +Private repos
Enterprise
$19/seat/mo
Engineering teams
- +Code search across monorepos
- +Self-hosted option
- +SSO + audit
Tofu
Growth
Custom
Mid-market
- +Email + ads + web
- +Brand library
- +HubSpot/Marketo sync
Recommended
Scale
Custom
Large brands
- +Unlimited campaigns
- +Multi-brand workspace
- +Advanced governance
Enterprise
Custom
Fortune 500
- +Custom integrations
- +Dedicated CS
- +Custom SLAs
Which one should you pick?
Sourcegraph Cody
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.
Try Sourcegraph Cody →Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Frequently asked
Should I pick Sourcegraph Cody or Tofu in 2026?+
Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Tofu if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Sourcegraph Cody for primary work and Tofu for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.
What's the price difference between Sourcegraph Cody and Tofu?+
Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9; Tofu starts at Subscription. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.
Which is more autonomous, Sourcegraph Cody or Tofu?+
Tofu is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.
Readers comparing Sourcegraph Cody and Tofu also picked
Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.
- Demo · hover to play
AWS's enterprise AI agent — coding assistant, business chat, and customizable Q apps grounded in your AWS data.
CodeTool useRAGMemoryDemo · hover to playGitHub's AI pair-programmer — inline completions, chat, and the new Agent mode that ships PRs.
CodeTool useMemoryDemo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Sourcegraph Cody · alternatives to Tofu
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison