aiagentrank.io

Sourcegraph Cody vs Tofuwhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?

Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.

💻CodeSemi-autonomousFreemium · from $9
CodeTool useRAGMemory

Autonomous campaign execution across email, ads, and web at brand-safe scale.

📣MarketingAutonomousSubscription
Tool useMemoryRAG

Sourcegraph Cody vs Tofu — specs

SpecSourcegraph CodyTofu
Agent Rank77 / 100 (A)63 / 100 (B)
AutonomySemi-autonomousAutonomous
PricingFreemium · from $9Subscription
Open sourceNoNo
CapabilitiesCode, Tool use, RAG, MemoryTool use, Memory, RAG
Integrations4 apps5 apps
VerifiedVerified
ReleasedFeb 2025Jun 2025

Categories: Sourcegraph CodyCode · TofuMarketing

Agent Rank breakdown

Sourcegraph Cody
Agent Rank
77/ 100
AA-tier
自律性
8
機能
8
連携
4
料金
8
完成度
8
検証性
10

自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?

Tofu
Agent Rank
63/ 100
BB-tier
自律性
9
機能
6
連携
6
料金
4
完成度
7
検証性
6

自律性、機能、連携、料金、成熟度、編集部の検証を基に自動算出。デプロイごとに更新されます。 どのように算出されているか?

Pros & cons

Sourcegraph Cody
メリット
  • +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
  • +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
  • +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
デメリット
  • Editor experience less polished than Cursor
  • Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
  • Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Tofu
メリット
  • +#1 in multiple 2026 marketing-agent buyer guides — top of the vertical
  • +Autonomous orchestration across email + ads + web (most agents only do one channel)
  • +Strong brand-governance — runs every output through brand library checks
デメリット
  • Enterprise pricing only — no SMB self-serve
  • Newer than Writer/Jasper — fewer Fortune 500 case studies
  • Best ROI requires existing martech stack (HubSpot/Marketo/Salesforce)

Pricing

Sourcegraph Cody
Free
無料
Personal use
  • +Limited chat + completions
  • +Public repos only
おすすめ
Pro
$9/
Solo devs
  • +Unlimited usage
  • +Larger context
  • +Private repos
Enterprise
$19/席/月
Engineering teams
  • +Code search across monorepos
  • +Self-hosted option
  • +SSO + audit
Tofu
Growth
カスタム
Mid-market
  • +Email + ads + web
  • +Brand library
  • +HubSpot/Marketo sync
おすすめ
Scale
カスタム
Large brands
  • +Unlimited campaigns
  • +Multi-brand workspace
  • +Advanced governance
Enterprise
カスタム
Fortune 500
  • +Custom integrations
  • +Dedicated CS
  • +Custom SLAs

Which one should you pick?

Sourcegraph Cody

Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.

Try Sourcegraph Cody →
Tofu

Pick Tofu if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.

Try Tofu →

Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Frequently asked

Should I pick Sourcegraph Cody or Tofu in 2026?+

Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Tofu if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Sourcegraph Cody for primary work and Tofu for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.

What's the price difference between Sourcegraph Cody and Tofu?+

Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9; Tofu starts at Subscription. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.

Which is more autonomous, Sourcegraph Cody or Tofu?+

Tofu is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.

Readers comparing Sourcegraph Cody and Tofu also picked

Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.

  • コードベース全体を把握した上で動作する自律的なコーディングエージェント — 深いコンテキストを活用したマルチファイル編集。

    💻開発半自律型フリーミアム · $30〜
    コード実行ツール利用メモリRAG
    77k2024年4月8日augmentcode.com
    Demo · hover to play
  • AWS のエンタープライズ向け AIエージェント — コーディングアシスタント、ビジネスチャット、AWS データに基づくカスタマイズ可能な Q アプリ。

    💻開発半自律型サブスクリプション · $19〜
    コード実行ツール利用RAGメモリ
    89k2025年4月2日aws.amazon.com
    Demo · hover to play
  • GitHub のAIペアプログラマー — インライン補完、チャット、そしてPRを自動作成する新しいAgent モードを搭載。

    💻開発半自律型サブスクリプション · $10〜
    コード実行ツール利用メモリ
    318k2025年2月12日github.com
    Demo · hover to play
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison
Sourcegraph Cody vs Tofu (2026): which AI code agent wins? · AI Agent Rank