aiagentrank.io
S'abonner

Sourcegraph Cody vs Tofuwhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?

Sourcegraph Cody

Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.

💻CodeSemi-autonomousFreemium · from $9
CodeTool useRAGMemory
Tofu

Autonomous campaign execution across email, ads, and web at brand-safe scale.

📣MarketingAutonomousSubscription
Tool useMemoryRAG

Sourcegraph Cody vs Tofu — specs

SpecSourcegraph CodyTofu
Agent Rank77 / 100 (A)63 / 100 (B)
AutonomySemi-autonomousAutonomous
PricingFreemium · from $9Subscription
Open sourceNoNo
CapabilitiesCode, Tool use, RAG, MemoryTool use, Memory, RAG
Integrations4 apps5 apps
VerifiedVerified—
ReleasedFeb 2025Jun 2025

Categories: Sourcegraph Cody → Code · Tofu → Marketing

Agent Rank breakdown

Sourcegraph Cody
Agent Rank
77/ 100
AA-tier
Autonomie
8
Capacités
8
Intégrations
4
Tarification
8
Maturité
8
Vérifiabilité
10

Calculé automatiquement à partir de l'autonomie, des capacités, des intégrations, de la tarification, de la maturité et de la vérification éditoriale. Mis à jour à chaque déploiement. Comment est-ce calculé ?

Tofu
Agent Rank
63/ 100
BB-tier
Autonomie
9
Capacités
6
Intégrations
6
Tarification
4
Maturité
7
Vérifiabilité
6

Calculé automatiquement à partir de l'autonomie, des capacités, des intégrations, de la tarification, de la maturité et de la vérification éditoriale. Mis à jour à chaque déploiement. Comment est-ce calculé ?

Pros & cons

Sourcegraph Cody
Pour
  • +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
  • +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
  • +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
Contre
  • −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
  • −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
  • −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments
Tofu
Pour
  • +#1 in multiple 2026 marketing-agent buyer guides — top of the vertical
  • +Autonomous orchestration across email + ads + web (most agents only do one channel)
  • +Strong brand-governance — runs every output through brand library checks
Contre
  • −Enterprise pricing only — no SMB self-serve
  • −Newer than Writer/Jasper — fewer Fortune 500 case studies
  • −Best ROI requires existing martech stack (HubSpot/Marketo/Salesforce)

Pricing

Sourcegraph Cody
Free
Gratuit
Personal use
  • +Limited chat + completions
  • +Public repos only
Recommandé
Pro
$9/mois
Solo devs
  • +Unlimited usage
  • +Larger context
  • +Private repos
Enterprise
$19/siège/mois
Engineering teams
  • +Code search across monorepos
  • +Self-hosted option
  • +SSO + audit
Tofu
Growth
Sur mesure
Mid-market
  • +Email + ads + web
  • +Brand library
  • +HubSpot/Marketo sync
Recommandé
Scale
Sur mesure
Large brands
  • +Unlimited campaigns
  • +Multi-brand workspace
  • +Advanced governance
Enterprise
Sur mesure
Fortune 500
  • +Custom integrations
  • +Dedicated CS
  • +Custom SLAs

Which one should you pick?

Sourcegraph Cody

Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy.

Try Sourcegraph Cody →
Tofu

Pick Tofu if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place.

Try Tofu →

Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Frequently asked

Should I pick Sourcegraph Cody or Tofu in 2026?+

Pick Sourcegraph Cody if cost is the main constraint or if you want a vendor we've verified for accessibility and pricing accuracy. Pick Tofu if you want the highest autonomy and the verification loop is in place. Most working teams running both can use Sourcegraph Cody for primary work and Tofu for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.

What's the price difference between Sourcegraph Cody and Tofu?+

Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9; Tofu starts at Subscription. Sourcegraph Cody is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.

Which is more autonomous, Sourcegraph Cody or Tofu?+

Tofu is the more autonomous of the two (Autonomous vs Semi-autonomous). Higher autonomy ships throughput faster but requires verification loops in place — see our autonomous-vs-copilot framing for when each tier wins.

Readers comparing Sourcegraph Cody and Tofu also picked

Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.

  • Augment Codev2A75

    Agent de développement autonome ancré dans l'ensemble de votre base de code — modifications multi-fichiers avec un contexte approfondi.

    💻CodeSemi-autonomeFreemium · à partir de 30 $
    Exécution de codeTool UseMemoryRAG
    77k8 avr. 2024augmentcode.com
    Start Augment free
    Demo · hover to play
  • Amazon Qv2A80

    L'agent IA d'entreprise d'AWS — assistant de codage, chat professionnel et applications Q personnalisables ancrées dans vos données AWS.

    💻CodeSemi-autonomeAbonnement · à partir de 19 $
    Exécution de codeTool UseRAGMemory
    89k2 avr. 2025aws.amazon.com
    Tester Amazon Q
    Demo · hover to play
  • GitHub Copilotv2A80

    L'assistant IA de pair-programming de GitHub — complétions inline, chat et le nouveau mode agent qui soumet des PR.

    💻CodeSemi-autonomeAbonnement · à partir de 10 $
    Exécution de codeTool UseMemory
    318k12 févr. 2025github.com
    Essai gratuit de Copilot
    Demo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Sourcegraph Cody · alternatives to Tofu
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison
Sourcegraph Cody vs Tofu (2026): which AI code agent wins? · AI Agent Rank