aiagentrank.io
Abonnieren

Continue vs Sourcegraph Codywhich AI code agent should you pick in 2026?

Continue

Open-source coding agent for VS Code and JetBrains — bring your own model, customize every prompt.

💻CodeSemi-autonomousOpen source
CodeTool useMemory
Sourcegraph Cody

Code intelligence agent for enterprise — answers questions about your code, navigates large monorepos.

💻CodeSemi-autonomousFreemium · from $9
CodeTool useRAGMemory

Continue vs Sourcegraph Cody — specs

SpecContinueSourcegraph Cody
Agent Rank77 / 100 (A)77 / 100 (A)
AutonomySemi-autonomousSemi-autonomous
PricingFree · OSSFreemium · from $9
Open sourceYesNo
CapabilitiesCode, Tool use, MemoryCode, Tool use, RAG, Memory
Integrations3 apps4 apps
VerifiedVerifiedVerified
ReleasedFeb 2025Feb 2025

Categories: Continue → Code · Sourcegraph Cody → Code

Agent Rank breakdown

Continue
Agent Rank
77/ 100
AA-tier
Autonomie
8
Fähigkeiten
6
Integrationen
4
Preise
10
Reife
8
Verifizierbarkeit
10

Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?

Sourcegraph Cody
Agent Rank
77/ 100
AA-tier
Autonomie
8
Fähigkeiten
8
Integrationen
4
Preise
8
Reife
8
Verifizierbarkeit
10

Automatisch berechnet aus Autonomie, Fähigkeiten, Integrationen, Preisen, Reife und redaktioneller Verifizierung. Bei jedem Deploy aktualisiert. Wie wird das berechnet?

Pros & cons

Continue
Pros
  • +Apache 2.0 — fully open source; auditable end-to-end
  • +Works with any OpenAI-compatible API endpoint, including local LLMs
  • +JetBrains support that Cursor and Cline lack
Cons
  • −Smaller community than Cursor or Cline
  • −Less polished than Cursor; requires more configuration
  • −No native MCP server marketplace — manual config required
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros
  • +Best-in-class code intelligence for large monorepos and polyglot codebases
  • +Self-hosted option for compliance-sensitive industries
  • +Cheaper than Cursor at the Pro tier
Cons
  • −Editor experience less polished than Cursor
  • −Agent autonomy still trails Cursor and Claude Code
  • −Best fit for established orgs with existing Sourcegraph deployments

Pricing

Continue
Open source
Kostenlos
Engineers + teams
  • +Apache 2.0 license
  • +BYO model API key
  • +VS Code + JetBrains support
Empfohlen
Hub
$20/Mo.
Teams sharing config
  • +Shared models + assistants
  • +Org-wide rules and prompts
  • +Usage analytics
Sourcegraph Cody
Free
Kostenlos
Personal use
  • +Limited chat + completions
  • +Public repos only
Empfohlen
Pro
$9/Mo.
Solo devs
  • +Unlimited usage
  • +Larger context
  • +Private repos
Enterprise
$19/Sitz/Mo.
Engineering teams
  • +Code search across monorepos
  • +Self-hosted option
  • +SSO + audit

Which one should you pick?

Continue

Pick Continue if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters.

Try Continue →
Sourcegraph Cody

Pick Sourcegraph Cody if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need.

Try Sourcegraph Cody →

Affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Frequently asked

Should I pick Continue or Sourcegraph Cody in 2026?+

Pick Continue if cost is the main constraint or if auditability or self-hosting matters. Pick Sourcegraph Cody if its specific capabilities (Code, Tool use) match what you need. Most working teams running both can use Continue for primary work and Sourcegraph Cody for the workflows where its specific strengths matter.

What's the price difference between Continue and Sourcegraph Cody?+

Continue starts at Free · OSS; Sourcegraph Cody starts at Freemium · from $9. Continue is the cheaper entry option. For team deployments the TCO can differ — use the AI Agent Rank TCO calculator for your specific volume.

Which is more autonomous, Continue or Sourcegraph Cody?+

Both Continue and Sourcegraph Cody are Semi-autonomous agents — neither has a meaningful autonomy advantage over the other. The decision should hinge on capabilities and pricing instead.

Readers comparing Continue and Sourcegraph Cody also picked

Adjacent agents in the same category with overlapping capabilities — worth a side-by-side glance before you commit.

  • Amazon Qv2A80

    Der Enterprise-KI-Agent von AWS – Coding-Assistent, Business-Chat und anpassbare Q-Apps auf Basis Ihrer AWS-Daten.

    💻CodeSemi-autonomAbonnement · ab 19 $
    CodeausführungTool-NutzungRAGMemory
    89k2. Apr. 2025aws.amazon.com
    Amazon Q testen
    Demo · hover to play
  • Augment Codev2A75

    Autonomer Coding-KI-Agent, verankert in Ihrer gesamten Codebasis — Multi-File-Bearbeitungen mit tiefem Kontextverständnis.

    💻CodeSemi-autonomFreemium · ab 30 $
    CodeausführungTool-NutzungMemoryRAG
    77k8. Apr. 2024augmentcode.com
    Start Augment free
    Demo · hover to play
See more alternatives: alternatives to Continue · alternatives to Sourcegraph Cody
Want the real monthly cost at your volume? Run the TCO calculator →
← Build your own comparison
Continue vs Sourcegraph Cody (2026): which AI code agent wins? · AI Agent Rank